RUMAS v. BALDWIN, 188 Wn. 558 (1936)

62 P.2d 1345 FABIO RUMAS, Appellant, v. CARL S. BALDWIN et al., Respondents. No. 26317. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 14, 1936. [1] CONTRACTS (59) — CONSTRUCTION — WRITTEN CONTRACTS — AMBIGUITY. A contract if ambiguous or requiring judicial interpretation will be construed against the party preparing it. [2] SAME (61) — CONSTRUCTION […]

Read More