SARRUF v. MILLER, 90 Wn.2d 880 (1978)

586 P.2d 466 ALEXANDER SARRUF, Respondent, v. DANIEL MILLER, ET AL, Defendants, BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 45409.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 9, 1978. [1] Judgment — Summary Judgment — Review — In General. In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court must make the same determination as the trial court, i.e., […]

Read More

SARRUF v. MILLER, 90 Wn.2d 880 (1978)

586 P.2d 466 ALEXANDER SARRUF, Respondent, v. DANIEL MILLER, ET AL, Defendants, BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 45409.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 9, 1978. [1] Judgment — Summary Judgment — Review — In General. In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court must make the same determination as the trial court, i.e., […]

Read More

SARRUF v. MILLER, 90 Wn.2d 880 (1978)

586 P.2d 466 ALEXANDER SARRUF, Respondent, v. DANIEL MILLER, ET AL, Defendants, BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 45409.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 9, 1978. [1] Judgment — Summary Judgment — Review — In General. In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court must make the same determination as the trial court, i.e., […]

Read More