LOVE v. KING COUNTY, 181 Wn. 462 (1935)

44 P.2d 175 HENRY K. LOVE, Respondent, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants, LAURENCE S. BOOTH, Intervener-respondent. No. 25576. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 11, 1935. [1] COUNTIES (62) — PAUPERS (1) — FISCAL MANAGEMENT — LIMITATION OF INDEBTEDNESS — NECESSARY EXPENSES. The constitutional limitation upon municipal indebtedness prescribed by Const. Art. VIII, […]

Read More