300 P.2d 574 JOHN S. HENRY, Appellant, v. VEIDA S. MORROW, Respondent.[1] No. 33428.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 9, 1956. [1] Reported in 300 P.2d 574. [1] CONTRACTS — CONSTRUCTION — RULES OF CONSTRUCTION — AMBIGUOUS INSTRUMENTS — LANGUAGE OF INSTRUMENT. In interpreting an ambiguous document, the trier of the facts is […]
Articles Tagged: 300 P.2d 574
HENRY v. MORROW, 49 Wn.2d 270 (1956)
300 P.2d 574 JOHN S. HENRY, Appellant, v. VEIDA S. MORROW, Respondent.[1] No. 33428.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 9, 1956. [1] Reported in 300 P.2d 574. [1] CONTRACTS — CONSTRUCTION — RULES OF CONSTRUCTION — AMBIGUOUS INSTRUMENTS — LANGUAGE OF INSTRUMENT. In interpreting an ambiguous document, the trier of the facts is […]
HENRY v. MORROW, 49 Wn.2d 270 (1956)
300 P.2d 574 JOHN S. HENRY, Appellant, v. VEIDA S. MORROW, Respondent.[1] No. 33428.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 9, 1956. [1] Reported in 300 P.2d 574. [1] CONTRACTS — CONSTRUCTION — RULES OF CONSTRUCTION — AMBIGUOUS INSTRUMENTS — LANGUAGE OF INSTRUMENT. In interpreting an ambiguous document, the trier of the facts is […]
NEVA v. NEVA, 49 Wn.2d 911 (1956)
300 P.2d 574 PAUL PETER NEVA, Respondent, v. SHIRLEY ANN NEVA, Appellant.[1] No. 33538.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 16, 1956. [1] Reported in 300 P.2d 574. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, No. 472415, Todd, J., entered July 18, 1955, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, […]