IDEAL INVESTMENT CO. v. NEELY, 147 Wn. 667 (1928)

267 P. 46 IDEAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Respondent, v. ROBERT NEELY et al., Appellants, J.C. HAAS et al., Defendants. No. 20989. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 10, 1928. [1] CONTINUANCE (20) — SURPRISE AT TRIAL — AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS. It is not an abuse of discretion to refuse a continuance because of the […]

Read More