D’AMICO v. CONGUISTA, 24 Wn.2d 674 (1946)

167 P.2d 157 MARY D’AMICO, as Administratix and Personally, Respondent, v. JOE CONGUISTA et al., Appellants.[1] No. 29674.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 19, 1946. [1] Reported in 167 P.2d 157. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — CONDITIONS ENTITLING PERSON TO BENEFITS. In order to entitle one to the benefits of the workmen’s compensation act, […]

Read More