Lake, Respondent, v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass’n et al., Petitioners. No. 81873-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 6, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 59211-4-I, December 31, 2007, 142 Wn. App. 356. Granted.
Articles Tagged: 165 Wn.2d 1012
SCHWEICKERT v. VENWEST YACHTS, 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2009)
Schweickert, Petitioner, v. Venwest Yachts, Inc., Respondent. No. 81669-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 6, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 58321-2-I, February 4, 2008, 142 Wn. App. 886. Denied.
STATE v. KINTZ, 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2008)
State, Respondent, v. Kintz, Petitioner. No. 81689-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 4, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 60082-6-I, May 10, 2008, 144 Wn. App. 515. Granted and consolidated under No. 81688-3, State v. Kintz.
STATE v. REGAN, 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2008)
State, Petitioner, v. Regan, Respondent. No. 81405-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 4, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 25184-5-III, February 26, 2008, 143 Wn. App. 419. Denied.
LAWSON v. CITY OF PASCO, 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2008)
Lawson, Petitioner, v. City of Pasco, Respondent. No. 81636-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 6, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 25967-6-III, April 24, 2008, 144 Wn. App. 203. Granted.
COSTANICH v. DEP’T OF SOC. HEALTH, 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2008)
Costanich, Petitioner, v. Dep’t of Soc. Health Servs., Respondent. No. 80874-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 5, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 57214-8-I, January 29, 2007, 138 Wn. App. 547. Granted.
PEEBLES v. RODLAND TOYOTA, INC., 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2009)
Peebles et al., Petitioners, v. Rodland Toyota, Inc., et al., Respondents. No. 81678-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 6, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 59721-3-I, April 14, 2008, 143 Wn. App. 1059. Denied. Page 1013