TACOMA v. HEINRICY, 190 Wn. 710 (1937)


68 P.2d 1031

THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. ED HEINRICY, Appellant.

No. 26524. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington.
May 24, 1937.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Remann, J., entered October 24, 1936, upon a trial and conviction of obstructing a public thoroughfare. Affirmed.

P.L. Pendleton and W.G. Palmer, for appellant.

Howard Carothers, Bartlett Rummel, and George F. Abel, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P.2d 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Page 711