THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROBBIE JON SIEGEL, Appellant.

No. 56288-6-I.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
August 14, 2006.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 05-1-00110-5, Stephen J. Dwyer, J., entered May 20, 2005.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Respondent, Washington Appellate Project, Attorney at Law, 1511 Third Avenue, Suite 701, Seattle, WA 9 8101.

Thomas Michael Kummerow, Washington Appellate Project, 1511 3rd Ave Ste 701, Seattle, WA 98101-3635.

Robbie Jon Siegel (info Only) (Appearing Pro Se), 4904 S 366th, Auburn, WA 98001.

Counsel for Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Charles Franklin Blackman, c/o Snohomish County Pros, 3000 Rockefeller Ave, Everett, WA 98201-4060.

Seth Aaron Fine, Attorney at Law, Snohomish Co Pros Ofc, 3000 Rockefeller Ave, Everett, WA 98201-4060.

PER CURIAM.

Robbie Siegel appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Relying primarily on City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 91 P.3d 875 (2004), he contends evidence seized in a search incident to an arrest for driving with a suspended license must be suppressed if the suspension itself violated due process. His arguments are controlled by the State Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Potter, _ Wn.2d _, 132 P.3d 1089 (2006).

Affirmed.

BAKER, ELLINGTON and GROSSE, JJ.

Page 1038