No. 46823-5-I.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
Filed: August 20, 2001. DO NOT CITE. SEE RAP 10.4(h). UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appeal from Superior Court of King County Docket No: 008008882 Judgment or order under review Date filed: 04/20/2000
Counsel for Appellant(s), Washington Appellate Project, Cobb Building, 1305 4th Avenue, Ste 802, Seattle, WA 98101.
Oliver R. Davis, Washington Appellate Project, Cobb Bldg, 1305 4th Ave Ste 802, Seattle, WA 98101.
Counsel for Respondent(s), Amy R. Holt, Room W554, 516 3rd Ave, Seattle, WA 98104.
PER CURIAM. .
M.C. appeals from the order of disposition entered in juvenile court finding her guilty of third degree theft. M.C.’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396, the motion to withdraw must:
[1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel’s brief should be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points that he chooses; [4] the court — not counsel — then proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 quoting Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744.
This procedure has been followed. M.C.’s counsel on appeal filed a brief with the motion to withdraw. M.C. was served with a copy of the brief and informed of the right to file a pro se supplemental brief. No supplemental brief has been filed in this case.
The facts are accurately set forth in counsel’s brief in support of the motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has also independently reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential issues raised by counsel on appeal:
1. Did the information adequately inform M.C. of the nature and cause of the charge against her?
2. Is the evidence sufficient to find M.C. guilty of third degree theft?
These potential issues are wholly frivolous. Nor can we find any other arguable issues of merit in this case.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is dismissed.