STATE v. JONES, 75 Wn.2d 951 (1968)

447 P.2d 706

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROY RILEY JONES, Appellant.[†]

No. 40473.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two.
December 5, 1968.

[†] Reported in 447 P.2d 706.

Motions filed in the Supreme Court August 30, 1968 and September 28, 1968, to withdraw as counsel and to dismiss the appeal. Granted.

Robert L. Avery and Harry D. Greer, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

R. DeWitt Jones and C. Brent Nevin, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for armed robbery. The case is now before the court on appellant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and respondent’s motion to dismiss the cause on the ground, among others, that the appeal is frivolous. Argument on these motions was heard on October 29, 1968.

After the appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, the trial court pursuant to ROA 46 (c) (2) (i) entered an order finding the appellant to be an indigent, authorizing the appeal to be perfected at public expense and appointing counsel to represent the appellant. A transcript and statement of facts have been prepared at public expense and filed in this court.

On August 30, 1968, appellant’s counsel filed a brief reviewing the case and setting forth the only two assignments of error which might arguably support an appeal, and at the same time filed a motion to

Page 952

withdraw in accordance with the rule announced in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 Sup. Ct. 1396
(1967), deeming the appeal to be without merit. It appears from the record that copies of appellant’s brief and his counsel’s motion for withdrawal were mailed to appellant on August 29, 1968.

A full examination of the proceeding discloses that the assignments of error cannot be supported by the record, and the court finds the appeal patently frivolous. The motion of appellant’s counsel to withdraw, and of respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds of frivolity are, therefore, granted.

It is so ordered.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 447 P.2d 706

Recent Posts

LANE v. WAHL, 6 P.3d 621 (Wash. App. 2000)

6 P.3d 621 (2000)101 Wash.App. 878 Wallace E. LANE and Patricia R. Lane, husband and…

3 years ago

Washington Attorney General Opinion No. 2018 No. 1

AGO 2018 No. 1 - Jan 9 2018 Attorney General DISTRICTS—ASSESSMENTS—PROPERTY—Authority Of Mosquito Control Districts To Assess State…

8 years ago

Washington Attonrey General Opinion 2017 No. 5

AGO 2017 No. 5 - Aug 3 2017 Attorney General Bob Ferguson OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT—PUBLIC MEETINGS—CONFIDENTIALITY—ETHICS—MUNICIPALITIES—CRIMES—Whether Information…

8 years ago

AGO 2017 No. 4

LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY TO COMBINE THE COMMISSION ON SALARIES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS WITH ANOTHER AGENCY, AND…

9 years ago

AGO 2017 No. 3

DESIGNATION AND COMPENSATION OF UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES OF THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE AGO 2017 No. 3…

9 years ago

AGO 2017 No. 2

USE OF RACE- OR SEX-CONSCIOUS MEASURES OR PREFERENCES TO REMEDY DISCRIMINATION IN STATE CONTRACTING AGO…

9 years ago