THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MALCOLM J. JACKSON, Appellant.

No. 59641-1-I.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
December 24, 2007.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 05-1-12883-2, Brian D. Gain, J., entered February 5, 2007.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Malcolm Jackson appeals his sentence for first degree assault. He contends his sentence violates double jeopardy because he received both a sentence for assault with a firearm and a sentence enhancement for the same firearm. He acknowledges that there is contrary authority, but argues that those decisions must be reconsidered in light of Blakely v.
Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403
(2004). We rejected the same argument in State v. Nguyen, 134 Wn. App. 863, 142 P.3d 1117 (2006) and State v. Esparza, 135 Wn. App. 54, 143 P.3d 612 (2006). Jackson offers no basis to depart from our decisions in those cases.

Affirmed.

Page 1015