No. 23832-6-IIIThe Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
Filed: May 31, 2005 UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appeal from Superior Court of Yakima County. Docket No: 96-1-00463-0. Judgment or order under review. Date filed: 10/01/1996. Judge signing: Hon. Stephen M Brown.
Counsel for Petitioner(s), Roberto Figueroa Alvarez (Appearing Pro Se), #756600, 191 Constantine Way, Aberdeen, WA 98520.
Counsel for Respondent(s), Kevin Gregory Eilmes, Attorney at Law, Pros Atty Offc Rm 329, 128 N 2nd St, Yakima, WA 98901-2639.
KATO, C.J.
Roberto Figueroa Alvarez seeks relief from personal restraint imposed for his 1996 Yakima County conviction upon plea of guilty to second degree felony murder involving the predicate felony of second degree assault. Mr. Alvarez claims his conviction must be vacated in light of our Supreme Court’s holding in In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602, 616, 56 P.3d 981 (2002), that assault may not serve as the predicate crime for second degree felony murder under former RCW 9A.32.050(1)(b) (1976).[1]
Under the holding of In re Pers. Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn.2d 853, 857-58, 100 P.3d 801 (2004), the decision in Andress applies retroactively to personal restraint petitioners convicted of the crime of second degree felony murder predicated on assault. Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861. Therefore, the petitioners’ judgments were facially invalid and not subject to the one year time limit of RCW 10.73.090(1) for collateral attack. The court also held that the 2003 legislative amendment that included assault as a predicate crime for second degree felony murder was not retroactive because retroactive application would violate the ex post facto clauses of the state and federal constitutions. Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861. The court thus vacated the petitioners’ convictions.
The State agrees that the holdings in Andress and Hinton apply to Mr. Alvarez’s case and entitle him to relief.
Accordingly, we grant Mr. Alvarez’s personal restraint petition to the extent that his second degree felony murder conviction and sentence is vacated and his case remanded to the Yakima County Superior Court for further lawful proceedings consistent with Andress and Hinton. Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861 (citing Andress, 147 Wn.2d at 617 n. 5).
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
SWEENEY, J. and SCHULTHEIS, J., Concur.