IN RE HUTCHINSON, 178 Wn. 112 (1934)

33 P.2d 1119

In the Matter of Disbarment of ARTHUR H. HUTCHINSON.

No. C.D. 1995. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington.
July 2, 1934.

[1] ATTORNEY AND CLIENT (7) — SUSPENSION AND DISBARMENT — GROUNDS FOR SUSPENSION — FAILURE TO ACCOUNT FOR COLLECTIONS. A judgment of suspension for one year will be sustained where it appears that an attorney collected and withheld his client’s money and refused to account therefor until disbarment proceedings were commenced.

Proceedings filed in the supreme court April 14, 1934, for the disbarment of an attorney, upon findings of the board of governors of the state bar association against the accused. Judgment of suspension for one year.

Matthew W. Hill, for board of governors.

Rummens Griffin, for accused.

MITCHELL, J.

This is a proceeding for the disbarment of Arthur H. Hutchinson. The board of governors of the Washington state bar association, at a formal hearing upon a written report made by a trial committee, has approved specific findings of the collection of money by the attorney for his clients, in several cases wherein he failed and refused to account,

Page 113

upon demands of his clients, and in which for long periods of time he evasively misrepresented the amounts received, or stated, in effect, that he had received nothing, and much of which amounts actually collected was still improperly withheld by him until after this disbarment proceeding was commenced. The board of governors has recommended that the accused be suspended from the practice of law in this state for one year.

[1] The findings are clearly sustained by the evidence, and, while a plea or argument in extenuation has been offered, we cannot think it reasonably mitigates the offenses. The recommendation of the board of governors, in our opinion, merits approval.

Therefore, the order is that the defendant be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of one year. Time will begin to run thirty days after the filing of this opinion and order.

ALL CONCUR.

Page 114

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 33 P.2d 1119

Recent Posts

LANE v. WAHL, 6 P.3d 621 (Wash. App. 2000)

6 P.3d 621 (2000)101 Wash.App. 878 Wallace E. LANE and Patricia R. Lane, husband and…

3 years ago

Washington Attorney General Opinion No. 2018 No. 1

AGO 2018 No. 1 - Jan 9 2018 Attorney General DISTRICTS—ASSESSMENTS—PROPERTY—Authority Of Mosquito Control Districts To Assess State…

8 years ago

Washington Attonrey General Opinion 2017 No. 5

AGO 2017 No. 5 - Aug 3 2017 Attorney General Bob Ferguson OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT—PUBLIC MEETINGS—CONFIDENTIALITY—ETHICS—MUNICIPALITIES—CRIMES—Whether Information…

8 years ago

AGO 2017 No. 4

LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY TO COMBINE THE COMMISSION ON SALARIES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS WITH ANOTHER AGENCY, AND…

9 years ago

AGO 2017 No. 3

DESIGNATION AND COMPENSATION OF UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES OF THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE AGO 2017 No. 3…

9 years ago

AGO 2017 No. 2

USE OF RACE- OR SEX-CONSCIOUS MEASURES OR PREFERENCES TO REMEDY DISCRIMINATION IN STATE CONTRACTING AGO…

9 years ago