DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[1] AND SELECTED MOTIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW[2]

The Supreme Court of Washington.
2001

[1] Orders disposing of petitions for review of Court of Appeals rulings for which the Court of Appeals did not write an opinion are identified by case names not in italic.
[2] The following orders disposing of motions for discretionary review are reported: (1) all motions involving cases that were decided by a Court of Appeals published opinion and (2) all granted motions in cases that will be set for consideration on the merits.

King, et at., Petitioners, v. Snohomish County, Respondent, King, et at., Petitioners, v. Snohomish County, Respondent, No. 70986-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, March 19, 2001, 105 Wn. App. 857. Granted October 30, 2001.

Right-Price Recreation, LLC, Respondent, v. Connells Prairie Cmty. Council, et at., Petitioners, No. 71099-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, April 20, 2001, 105 Wn. App. 813 Granted October 30, 2001.

Samuel’s Furniture, Inc., et at., Petitioners, v. Dep’t of Ecology, Respondent, No. 71181-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, March 12, 2001, 105 Wn. App. 278. Granted October 30, 2001.

State, Petitioner, v. Atbrecht, Respondent, No. 71214-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, May 10, 2001, 106 Wn. App. 163. Granted October 30, 2001.

State, Respondent, v. Schultz, Petitioner, No. 71221-2. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, April 23, 2001, 106 Wn. App. 328. Granted October 30, 2001.

Page 1002

Tagged: