STATE v. HUNTER, 11 Wn.2d 282 (1941)

118 P.2d 947 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HUNTER, Appellant.[1] No. 28377.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 17, 1941. [1] Reported in 118 P.2d 947. [1] RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS — KNOWLEDGE OF THEFT — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In a prosecution for knowingly receiving stolen goods, evidence set out and held to […]

Read More

STATE v. ANNYAS, 161 Wn.2d 1021 (2007)

172 P.3d 360 State, Respondent, v. Annyas, Petitioner. No. 79380-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 4, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 55512-0-I, September 25, 2006, 135 Wn. App. 1001. Denied.

Read More

STATE EX REL. CRABB v. OLINGER, 191 Wn. 534 (1937)

71 P.2d 545 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Ray Crabb, Plaintiff, v. JAY OLINGER, as Supervisor of Industrial Insurance, et al., Respondents. No. 26623. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 16, 1937. [1] MASTER AND SERVANT — WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — REMEDIES — REVIEW — STAY OF PROCEEDINGS. Rem. Rev. Stat., § […]

Read More

GASTKILL v. FORREST, 68 Wn.2d 630 (1966)

414 P.2d 613 KAREN L. GASTKILL, Appellant, v. ALLEN H. FORREST, Respondent.[*] No. 38255.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 19, 1966. [*] Reported in 414 P.2d 613. [1] Negligence — Gross Negligence — What Constitutes. A person exercising a degree of care appreciably less than the quantum of care inhering in ordinary negligence, […]

Read More

STATE v. HEMLER, 166 Wn.2d 1018 (2009)

210 P.3d 1019 State, Respondent, v. Hemler, Petitioner. No. 82761-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 8, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 61408-8-I, January 27, 2009. Denied.

Read More

STATE v. WILSON, 168 Wn.2d 1018 (2010)

State, Respondent, v. Wilson, Petitioner. No. 83797-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 30, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 37496-0-II, August 13, 2009, 151 Wn. App. 1044. Granted.

Read More

DIECKMAN v. DEPT. LABOR IND., 49 Wn.2d 378 (1956)

301 P.2d 763 LOIS M. DIECKMAN, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.[1] No. 33333.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 27, 1956. [1] Reported in 301 P.2d 763. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — EMPLOYEES WITHIN ACT — INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. In a proceeding for a widow’s pension, held that the claimant’s husband at […]

Read More

VAN BUREN v. HIGHWAY RANCH, INC., 46 Wn.2d 582 (1955)

283 P.2d 132 AMIEL VAN BUREN et al., Respondents, v. HIGHWAY RANCH, INC., et al., Appellants.[1] No. 33037.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 5, 1955. [1] Reported in 283 P.2d 132. [1] CORPORATIONS — STOCKHOLDERS — RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES AS TO CORPORATION — SALE OR LEASE OF CORPORATE ASSETS. As a general rule, […]

Read More

BEYERS v. MOORE, 45 Wn.2d 68 (1954)

272 P.2d 626 WILSON BEYERS, Appellant, v. CARL MOORE et al., Respondents.[1] No. 32771.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. July 26, 1954. [1] Reported in 272 P.2d 626. [1] HUSBAND AND WIFE — COMMUNITY PROPERTY — COMMUNITY OBLIGATIONS — NOTE SIGNED BY HUSBAND — PRESUMPTIONS — EVIDENCE. The burden of proving that a promissory […]

Read More

STANDLEE v. SMITH, 83 Wn.2d 405 (1974)

518 P.2d 721 In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of DARYL STANDLEE, Petitioner, v. SIDNEY E. SMITH, Respondent. No. 42729.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 31, 1974. [1] Judgment — Res Judicata — Collateral Estoppel — Nature — In General. The doctrine of collateral estoppel, part of […]

Read More

HOMANN v. HUBER, 38 Wn.2d 190 (1951)

228 P.2d 466 A.G. HOMANN, Respondent, v. H.H. HUBER et al., Defendants, JAMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.[1] No. 31310.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. March 9, 1951. [1] Reported in 228 P.2d 466. [1] MECHANICS’ LIENS — CONTRACTORS, LABORERS, MATERIALMEN — OPERATION AND EFFECT — PRIORITY. Ordinarily, liens of the same class on the same […]

Read More

STATE v. BAKER, 78 Wn.2d 327 (1970)

474 P.2d 254 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. GARY J. BAKER, Appellant.[*] No. 40480.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 10, 1970. [*] Reported in 474 P.2d 254. [1] Courts of Limited Jurisdiction — Judgment — Correction After Appeal. JCrR 8.03, which relates to correction of clerical mistakes in judgments, does not authorize […]

Read More

RAKHSHAN v. WHATCOM COUNTY, 167 Wn.2d 1011 (2009)

220 P.3d 207 Rakhshan, Petitioner, v. Whatcom County, Respondent. No. 83410-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 1, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 61697-8-I, April 27, 2009, 149 Wn. App. 1063. Review Orders. Denied.

Read More

GATTAVARA v. CASCADE PETROLEUM CO., 27 Wn.2d 263 (1947)

177 P.2d 894 V. GATTAVARA et al., Respondents, v. CASCADE PETROLEUM COMPANY, Appellant.[1] No. 30009.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. February 27, 1947. [1] Reported in 177 P.2d 894. [1] LANDLORD AND TENANT — LEASES — OPTION FOR RENEWAL — NOTICE — CONTINUED POSSESSION. Where a lease gave the lessee the right to a […]

Read More

REVIEW ORDERS, 147 Wn.2d 1016 (2002)

The Supreme Court of Washington. 2002 State, Respondent, v. Sell, et al., Petitioners, No. 72508-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 48017-1-I and 48018-9-I, April 1, 2002, 110 Wn. App. 741. Denied October 29, 2002. State, Respondent, v. Howard, Petitioner, No. 72510-1. Petition for review of a decision of […]

Read More

DAVIS v. LABOR INDUS., 94 Wn.2d 119 (1980)

615 P.2d 1279 SUSAN S. DAVIS, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 46256.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 7, 1980. [1] Appeal and Error — Findings of Fact — Failure To Assign Error — Effect. When no error is assigned to a trial court’s findings of fact, […]

Read More

CORBALEY v. PIERCE COUNTY, 197 Wn. 102 (1938)

84 P.2d 666 A.L. CORBALEY, as Administrator, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY, Appellant, WASHINGTON NAVIGATION COMPANY et al., Defendants. No. 27162. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 28, 1938. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — RECORD — STATEMENT OF FACTS — PROPOSAL OF AMENDMENTS — NECESSITY. Where, on appeal, a judgment was reversed and the remittitur […]

Read More

PHILBRICK v. PARR., 47 Wn.2d 505 (1955)

288 P.2d 246 E.A. PHILBRICK, as Administrator, Appellant, v. WILLIAM L. PARR et al., Respondents.[1] No. 33309.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. September 29, 1955. [1] Reported in 288 P.2d 246. [1] EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS — ACCOUNTING AND SETTLEMENT — OPERATION AND EFFECT — PERSONS AND MATTERS CONCLUDED. An order entered upon the final […]

Read More

ALLIED DAILY NEWSPAPERS v. EIKENBERRY, 121 Wn.2d 205 (1993)

848 P.2d 1258 ALLIED DAILY NEWSPAPERS OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents, v. KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY, as Attorney General, ET AL, Appellants. No. 59435-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 1, 1993. [1] Constitutional Law — Construction — State and Federal Provisions — Priority of Consideration. When both state and federal constitutional provisions are asserted […]

Read More

STATE v. FIDDLER, 57 Wn.2d 815 (1961)

360 P.2d 155 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ALBERT ALFRED FIDDLER, Appellant.[1] No. 35442.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. March 9, 1961. [1] Reported in 360 P.2d 155. [1] RAPE — STATUTORY RAPE — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In a prosecution for carnal knowledge, there was no merit in a contention by the accused […]

Read More

DUMONT v. CITY OF SEATTLE, 166 Wn.2d 1025 (2009)

217 P.3d 336 Dumont, Respondent, v. City of Seattle, Petitioner. No. 82923-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 9, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 61701-0-I, February 17, 2009, 148 Wn. App. 850. Denied.

Read More

DAVIS v. BADER, 57 Wn.2d 871 (1961)

360 P.2d 352 RICHARD DAVIS et al., Appellants, v. ANTHONY A. BADER et al., Respondents.[1] No. 35618.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. March 23, 1961. [1] Reported in 360 P.2d 352. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — REVIEW — SCOPE OF REVIEW. It is not the province of the Supreme Court to determine the credibility […]

Read More

STATE v. MEYER, 96 Wn. 257 (1917)

164 P. 926 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CHARLES A. MEYER, Appellant.[1] No. 13786.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 11, 1917. [1] Reported in 164 Pac. 926. Page 258 Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Back, J., entered June 1, 1916, upon a trial and conviction of murder in […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 103 Wn.2d 1040 (1984)

The Supreme Court of Washington. Taylor, Respondent, v. Cessna Aircraft Co., Petitioner, Estate of Alexander, Respondent, No. 51603-1. Petitions for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 21, 1985, 39 Wn. App. 828. Denied May 24, 1985. State, Respondent, v. McDaniel, Petitioner, No. 51045-8. Petition for review of a decision of the […]

Read More

FISHER BROS. v. DES MOINES SEWER DIST., 97 Wn.2d 227 (1982)

643 P.2d 436 FISHER BROTHERS CORPORATION, ET AL, Petitioners, v. DES MOINES SEWER DISTRICT, Respondent. No. 47931-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 8, 1982. [1] Utility Services — Sewer Districts — Assessments — Judicial Review — Bond. The appeal bond requirement of RCW 56.20.080 for obtaining judicial review to challenge the legality of […]

Read More

STATE v. EDER, 129 Wn.2d 1013 (1996)

917 P.2d 576 State, Respondent, v. Eder, Petitioner. No. 63220-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 4, 1996. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, June 26, 1995, 78 Wn. App. 352. Denied June 4, 1996.

Read More

STATE v. MARLER, 129 Wn.2d 1024 (1996)

919 P.2d 601 State, Petitioner, v. Marler, Respondent. No. 63952-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 10, 1996. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, March 5, 1996, 80 Wn. App. 765. Denied July 10, 1996.

Read More

WERNER v. WERNER, 84 Wn.2d 360 (1974)

526 P.2d 370 ANTONIJA WERNER et al., Plaintiffs, v. OTTIE C. WERNER et al., Defendants, MARTIN A. QUARNSTROM et al., Appellants, ROGER W. JOHNSON et al., Respondents. No. 42768.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 5, 1974. [1] Courts — Jurisdiction — Nonresidents — Due Process — Long-arm Statute — Application. Long-arm jurisdiction under […]

Read More

STATE v. EARL, 164 Wn.2d 1027 (2008)

State, Respondent, v. Earl, Petitioner. No. 81501-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 2, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 34629-0-II, January 23, 2008, 142 Wn. App. 768. Denied October 2, 2008. Review Orders.

Read More

HANSON v. WASHINGTON WATER POWER CO., 165 Wn. 497 (1931)

5 P.2d 1025 RALPH HANSON, as Guardian ad litem of Ralph Hanson, Jr., a Minor, Appellant, v. THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY, Respondent. No. 23362. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 11, 1931. [1] ELECTRICITY (6) — INJURIES INCIDENT TO PRODUCTION OR USE — CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE. In an action for injuries sustained by a […]

Read More

STATE v. HEATON, 149 Wn. 452 (1928)

271 P. 89 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. GEORGE S. HEATON, et al., Defendants, GEORGE S. HEATON, Appellant. No. 21181. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 19, 1928. [1] CRIMINAL LAW (198) — TRIAL — ENDORSEMENT OF WITNESSES — ADDITION — DISCRETION. It is discretionary to allow the endorsement of additional witnesses on […]

Read More

FEELEY v. BUTTERWORTH SONS, 42 Wn.2d 837 (1953)

259 P.2d 393 MIKE J. FEELEY, Appellant, v. E.R. BUTTERWORTH SONS et al., Respondents.[1] No. 32098.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. July 8, 1953. [1] Reported in 259 P.2d 393. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — REVIEW — FINDINGS. If findings of fact have support in the evidence, they will not be overturned. [2] ADJOINING […]

Read More

PAPPAS v. HERSHBERGER, 85 Wn.2d 152 (1975)

530 P.2d 642 CHARLES A. PAPPAS et al, Petitioners, v. E.A. HERSHBERGER et al, Respondents. No. 43185.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 23, 1975. [1] Appeal and Error — Assignments of Error — Argument in Support — Necessity. An assignment of error that is not argued in the brief is considered to have […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[†] , 119 Wn.2d 1008 (1992)

The Supreme Court of Washington. [†] Dispositions of Court of Appeals Commissioner rulings are identified by case names not in italic. Bays, Petitioner, v. St. Luke’s Hosp., Defendant, DeWitt, Respondent, No. 59195-4. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, January 21, 1992, 63 Wn. App. 876. Denied June 2, 1992. State, […]

Read More

GOEBEL v. HALL, 132 Wn. 30 (1924)

231 P. 6 JOHN GOEBEL, Appellant, v. AGNES HALL, as Executrix etc., Respondent. No. 18485. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 18, 1924. EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS (90) — CLAIMS — ACTION TO ESTABLISH — PLEADING — COMPLAINT — SUFFICIENCY. A complaint upon a creditor’s claim stating in usual form the making of the note […]

Read More

STATE v. MENDOZA, 156 Wn.2d 1031 (2006)

134 P.3d 232 State, Respondent, v. Mendoza, Petitioner. No. 77587-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 2, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 30852-5-II, July 26, 2005, 128 Wn. App. 1052. Granted.

Read More

STATE v. REHAK, 131 Wn.2d 1014 (1997)

State, Respondent, v. Rehak, Petitioner. No. 64555-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 6, 1997. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, August 19, 1996, 82 Wn. App. 1066. Denied March 6, 1997.

Read More

IN RE LAGUNILLA, 30 Wn.2d 777 (1948)

193 P.2d 875 In the Matter of the Application of MATIAS LAGUNILLA for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.[1] No. 30588.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. May 25, 1948. [1] Reported in 193 P.2d 875. [1] HABEAS CORPUS — PROCEEDINGS REVIEWABLE — CIVIL CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS — LEGALITY OF ORDER OF COMMITMENT — COERCIVE MEASURE. Where […]

Read More

PACIFIC FIRST FED. v. STATE, 92 Wn.2d 402 (1979)

598 P.2d 387 PACIFIC FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant. No. 45561.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 2, 1979. [1] Taxation — Business and Occupation Tax — Apportionment — Investment Income. RCW 82.04.460 and implementing regulations, which permit apportionment of gross income derived from services rendered […]

Read More

BROWN v. PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WASH., 39 Wn.2d 776 (1951)

238 P.2d 1191 WILLIAM LOYD BROWN et al., Appellants, v. PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON IN SEATTLE et al., Respondents.[1] No. 31711.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. December 13, 1951. [1] Reported in 238 P.2d 1191. [1] PLEADING — GENERAL DEMURRER — EFFECT. A general demurrer to a complaint must be sustained where no […]

Read More

STATE v. REBOLLEDO, 167 Wn.2d 1019 (2010)

224 P.3d 773 State, Respondent, v. Rebolledo, Petitioner. No. 83506-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. Denied January 5, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 61735-4-I, July 20, 2009, 151 Wn. App. 1012. Review Order. Denied

Read More

STATE EX REL. OREGON ETC. v. YELLE, 47 Wn.2d 804 (1955)

289 P.2d 1027 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of the Oregon State Highway Commission et al., Plaintiff, v. CLIFF YELLE, as State Auditor, Respondent, CLARK COUNTY, Intervener.[1] No. 33375.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 10, 1955. [1] Reported in 289 P.2d 1027. [1] STATES — ACTIONS — WHAT ARE SUITS AGAINST […]

Read More

CARUSO v. LOCAL 690, 107 Wn.2d 524 (1987)

730 P.2d 1299 ROBERT E. CARUSO, Respondent, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 690 OF INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, ET AL, Appellants. No. 51554-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 8, 1987. [1] Trial — Instructions — Harmless Error — Effect on Outcome. An error in instructions is harmless if […]

Read More

SUP’R PORT. ETC. v. PAC. COAST ETC., 33 Wn.2d 169 (1949)

205 P.2d 597 SUPERIOR PORTLAND CEMENT, INC., Appellant, v. PACIFIC COAST CEMENT COMPANY, Respondent.[1] No. 30700.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 14, 1949. [1] Reported in 205 P.2d 597. [1] LANDLORD AND TENANT — TERMS FOR YEARS — OPTION TO PURCHASE — “FIRST REFUSAL.” The right of first refusal is ordinarily a covenant […]

Read More

IN RE SIIPOLA v. CRANOR, 38 Wn.2d 848 (1951)

232 P.2d 920 In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of NELS SIIPOLA, Petitioner, v. JOHN R. CRANOR, as Warden of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1] No. 31799.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. June 28, 1951. [1] Reported in 232 P.2d 920. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE — […]

Read More

McARTHUR v. DEPT. LABOR INDUSTRIES, 173 Wn. 701 (1933)

23 P.2d 417 W.J. McARTHUR, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent. No. 24480. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 26, 1933. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wilson, J., entered March 20, 1933, upon findings, affirming a decision of the joint board of the department of […]

Read More

PIERCE v. LOWENTHAL, 161 Wn. 336 (1931)

295 P. 1021 LESTER E. PIERCE, Respondent, v. CHARLES LOWENTHAL et al., Appellants. No. 22934. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 19, 1931. [1] BILLS AND NOTES (49, 71) — RIGHTS ON INDORSEMENT — LIABILITY ON INDORSEMENTS — ACCOMMODATION MAKER — TITLE AND RIGHTS OF BONA FIDE HOLDER. An indorsement in blank of a […]

Read More

STATE v. SHAVIES, 171 Wn.2d 1009 (2011)

249 P.3d 1028 State, Respondent, v. Shavies, Petitioner. No. 85290-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 29, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 39062-1-II, September 28, 2010, 157 Wn. App. 1075. Denied.

Read More

WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER CO. v. PIERCE COUNTY, 133 Wn. 355 (1925)

233 P. 922 WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER COMPANY, Respondent, v. PIERCE COUNTY et al., Appellants. No. 18647. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 12, 1925. TAXATION (100, 103) — VALUATION OF PROPERTY — EQUALIZATION — REVIEW — CERTIORARI OR SUIT IN EQUITY. A writ of certiorari to review the action of the board of equalization in […]

Read More

DAVIS v. MICROSOFT CORP., 149 Wn.2d 521 (2003)

70 P.3d 126 THOMAS DAVIS, Petitioner, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 72250-1.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued October 17, 2002. Decided June 5, 2003. Page 522 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 523 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE […]

Read More

CONTINENTAL COAL CO. v. UNITED FUEL CO., 176 Wn. 271 (1934)

29 P.2d 395 CONTINENTAL COAL COMPANY, Respondent, v. UNITED FUEL COMPANY et al., Appellants. CONTINENTAL COAL COMPANY, Respondent, v. FOLGER PEABODY et al., Appellants. UNITED FUEL COMPANY, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL COAL COMPANY, Respondent, SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, Appellant. No. 24631. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 24, 1934. [1] CONTRACTS (132, 158) — […]

Read More

IN RE HALLSTROM’S ESTATE, 198 Wn. 214 (1939)

88 P.2d 405 In the Matter of the Estate of ERIK HALLSTROM, Deceased. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, by Robt. F. Waldron, as Supervisor of the State Inheritance Tax and Escheat Division, Appellant, v. ANNA MARY HALLSTROM, as Executrix, et al., Respondents. No. 27327. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 13, 1939. [1] TAXATION — […]

Read More

PAPE v. DEPT. LABOR IND., 43 Wn.2d 736 (1953)

264 P.2d 241 J.W. PAPE, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.[1] No. 32367.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 27, 1953. [1] Reported in 264 P.2d 241. [1] STATUTES — CONSTRUCTION — PROSPECTIVE OR RETROSPECTIVE OPERATION. Laws may operate either prospectively or retrospectively, or both, a prospective law being one which […]

Read More

DAVES v. NASTOS, 105 Wn.2d 24 (1985)

711 P.2d 314 SUSAN DAVES, ET AL, Petitioners, v. CHRIS NASTOS, Respondent. No. 51444-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. December 12, 1985. [1] Names — Juveniles — Paternity — Change of Surname — Authority of Court — Statutory Provisions. A name change in a paternity action requires compliance with RCW 4.24.130 and should be […]

Read More

STATE v. SWANSON, 73 Wn.2d 698 (1968)

440 P.2d 492 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHN K. SWANSON, Appellant.[*] No. 39422.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. May 2, 1968. [*] Reported in 440 P.2d 492. [1] Criminal Law — Trial — Conduct of Counsel — Prejudice. A prosecutor’s misconduct in aiding a witness in identifying the defendant who was seated […]

Read More

SWEET v. LEASE, 154 Wn. 25 (1929)

280 P. 742 DAISEY E. SWEET et al., Respondents, v. J.E. LEASE et al., Appellants. No. 21805. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 24, 1929. [1] FIXTURES (7) — BETWEEN MORTGAGOR AND MORTGAGEE — MACHINERY AND APPLIANCES. As between mortgagor and mortgagee, platform scales, installed not on the mortgaged premises, except the balancing beam […]

Read More

STATE v. WILLIS, 151 Wn.2d 1017 (2004)

State, Respondent, v. Willis, Petitioner. No. 74561-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 7, 2004. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 29389-7-II, September 2, 2003, 118 Wn. App. 1026. Granted on limited issues April 7, 2004.

Read More

THOMAS v. HOUSING AUTH. OF BREMERTON, 71 Wn.2d 69 (1967)

426 P.2d 836 CARRIE THOMAS, Respondent, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, Appellant.[*] No. 38561.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 13, 1967. [*] Reported in 426 P.2d 836. [1] Negligence — Foreseeability of Injury — Sufficiency. For a defendant to be held liable for maintaining a dangerous condition, proof as to […]

Read More

CREEGAN v. THOMPSON, 136 Wn. 606 (1925)

241 P. 10 MIKE CREEGAN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM THOMPSON et al., Respondents. No. 18941. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 30, 1925. DAMAGES (78) — BREACH OF CONTRACT — FAILURE TO DELIVER CORPORATE STOCK. An action for damages for failure to return to the seller corporate stock, upon the purchaser’s default in the payment […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. AM. AUTO. INS. CO. v. FISHBACK, 154 Wn. 297 (1929)

282 P. 62 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of American Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v. H.O. FISHBACK, Respondent. No. 22022. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 12, 1929. [1] CORPORATIONS (247) — INSURANCE (1, 2) — FOREIGN CORPORATIONS — RIGHT TO DO BUSINESS IN STATE — REGULATION — INVESTMENTS — STATUTES. Under […]

Read More

STATE v. ROBERTS, 172 Wn.2d 1017 (2011)

262 P.3d 64 State, Respondent, v. Roberts, Petitioner. No. 85565-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 27, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 63168-3-I, October 25, 2010, 158 Wn. App. 174. Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals.

Read More

STATE v. HAYE, 72 Wn.2d 461 (1967)

433 P.2d 884 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ARTHUR RAYMOND HAYE, Appellant.[*] No. 39201.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 9, 1967. [*] Reported in 433 P.2d 884. [1] Criminal Law — Double Jeopardy — Application and Assertion. In order to establish the bar of double jeopardy, an accused must show that he […]

Read More

HOFFMAN v. TRACY, 67 Wn.2d 31 (1965)

406 P.2d 323 PAUL HOFFMAN, JR., as Guardian, Respondent, v. Phillip S. TRACY, as Administrator, Appellant.[*] No. 37656.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. September 30, 1965. [*] Reported in 406 P.2d 323. [1] Evidence — Blood Specimens — Introduction Into Evidence. When the results of a blood-alcohol test are offered in evidence, the party […]

Read More

INTERNET CORP. v. GAMBLING COMM’N, 169 Wn.2d 687 (2010)

238 P.3d 1163 INTERNET COMMUNITY ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. THE WASHINGTON STATE GAMBLING COMMISSION, Petitioner. No. 82845-8.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued May 27, 2010. Decided September 2, 2010. Page 688 Appeal from the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 07-2-01334-0, Gary R. Tabor, J. Robert M. McKenna, Attorney General, Jerry A. Ackerman, Senior Counsel, and […]

Read More

PEARSON v. VANDERMAY, 67 Wn.2d 222 (1965)

407 P.2d 143 PHYLLIS PEARSON, Respondent, v. JOHN VANDERMAY et al., Appellants.[*] No. 37696.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. October 28, 1965. [*] Reported in 407 P.2d 143. [1] Judgment — Pleading — Motion for Judgment on Pleadings — Effect. In ruling on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the trial court must […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 111 Wn.2d 1009 (1988)

The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Haggard, Petitioner. State, Respondent, v. Knapp, Petitioner, No. 55251-7. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, May 10, 1988, 51 Wn. App. 1032 Denied September 1, 1988. Grange Ins. Ass’n, Respondent, v. Morgavi, et al, Petitioners, No. 55265-7. Petition for review of a […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. PUGET SD. NAV. CO. v. DEPT. P.W., 164 Wn. 237 (1931)

2 P.2d 686 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Puget Sound Navigation Company, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WASHINGTON et al., Respondents. No. 22992. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 1, 1931. [1] CARRIERS (3-2, 3-4) — REGULATION — RIGHT TO CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE — PRIORITY — TERRITORY ALREADY SERVED […]

Read More

ERECTION CO. v. LABOR INDUSTRIES, 121 Wn.2d 513 (1993)

852 P.2d 288 THE ERECTION COMPANY, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Petitioner. No. 59490-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 20, 1993. [1] Statutes — Construction — Meaning of Words — Ordinary Meaning — In General. Unless a contrary legislative intent is apparent in a statute, words in a statute are […]

Read More

YAMAUCHI v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, 96 Wn.2d 773 (1982)

638 P.2d 1253 SUSAN JO YAMAUCHI, Petitioner, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent. No. 47778-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 14, 1982. [1] Statutes — Construction — Legislative Intent — Purpose of Legislation. In determining the legislative intent as to an ambiguous statutory term, the courts will look at the purposes of […]

Read More

COLUMBIA LBR. CO. v. BUSH, 13 Wn.2d 657 (1942)

126 P.2d 584 COLUMBIA LUMBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. C.W. BUSH et al., Respondents.[1] No. 28517.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. June 5, 1942. [1] Reported in 126 P.2d 584. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — REVIEW — FINDINGS — IN EQUITABLE ACTIONS. Where the record on appeal in an equity case contains both the findings […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. SWAN v. JONES, 47 Wn.2d 718 (1955)

289 P.2d 982 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Edgar M. Swan, Appellant, v. R. DEWITT JONES, Prosecuting Attorney for Clark County, Respondent.[1] No. 32831.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 10, 1955. [1] Reported in 289 P.2d 982. [1] NEWSPAPERS — CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS TO PUBLICATION — “DAILY NEWSPAPERS.” A newspaper […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 141 Wn.2d 1029 (2000)

The Supreme Court of Washington. 2000. Russell, Petitioner, v. Kitsap County Sheriffs Dep’t, et al., Respondents, No. 69758-2. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, April 14, 2000, 100 Wn. App. 1028. Denied October 11, 2000. Bawazir, Petitioner, v. The Boeing Co., et al., Respondents, No. 69847-3. Petition for review of […]

Read More

VAN GEEST v. STOCKS, 198 Wn. 218 (1939)

88 P.2d 406 C. VAN GEEST et al., Appellants, v. MAMIE STOCKS et al., Respondents. No. 27325. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 14, 1939. [1] HUSBAND AND WIFE — COMMUNITY LIABILITY — TORTS OF HUSBAND — BENEFIT TO COMMUNITY. While a claim arising before marriage is a separate, and not a community, debt, […]

Read More

LINDQUIST v. DENGEL, 92 Wn.2d 257 (1979)

595 P.2d 934 BRUCE LINDQUIST, ET AL, Respondents, v. DANIEL M. DENGEL, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 45737.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 31, 1979. Page 258 [1] Torts — Negligent Treatment of Injuries — Liability — In General. An original tort-feasor is also liable for any additional harm resulting from the normal efforts […]

Read More

IN RE ZIMMERLI’S ESTATE, 162 Wn. 243 (1931)

298 P. 326 In the Matter of the Estate of FRED ZIMMERLI, Deceased. No. 22765. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 24, 1931. [1] WILLS (44) — PROBATE AND ANNULMENT — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY — REVOCATION FOR FORGERY. Findings that a purported will was a forgery and that the testimony of attesting witness was […]

Read More

STATE v. PACHECO, 125 Wn.2d 150 (1994)

882 P.2d 183 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. HERBERT LARRY PACHECO, Petitioner. No. 60864-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 20, 1994. [1] Statutes — Construction — Legislative Intent — In General. A court’s primary objective in interpreting a statute is to carry out the intent of the Legislature. [2] Statutes — Construction […]

Read More

IN RE MARRIAGE OF CURRIE, 165 Wn.2d 1022 (2009)

In re Marriage of Currie. No. 81919-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 3, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 60232-2-I and 60831-2-I, June 23, 2008, 145 Wn. App. 1020. Denied

Read More

STATE v. NICHOLS, 157 Wn.2d 1013 (2006)

139 P.3d 351 STATE, Respondent v. NICHOLS, Petitioner. No. 77976-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 7, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 31800-8-II, September 15, 2005, 129 Wn. App. 1025. Denied.

Read More

HUGHES v. KRAMER, 82 Wn.2d 537 (1973)

511 P.2d 1344 HILDUR JOSEPHINE HUGHES et al., Petitioners, v. A. LUDLOW KRAMER, Secretary of State, Respondent. No. 42547.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. July 19, 1973. [1] Constitutional Law — Loyalty Oaths — Validity — Supporting Constitution and Laws. An oath to support the constitutions and laws of the state and nation is […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 143 Wn.2d 1004 (2001)

The Supreme Court of Washington. 2001. State, Petitioner, v. Adams, Respondent, No. 70330-2, Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, August 8, 2000, 101 Wn. App. 1075. Denied March 6, 2001. State, Respondent, v. Cochran, Petitioner, No. 70327-2. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, September 7, […]

Read More

ARNOLD v. RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, 128 Wn.2d 765 (1996)

912 P.2d 463 PATRICIA ARNOLD, Respondent v. DEPARTMENT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, Petitioner. No. 62260-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 7, 1996. Page 766 Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, and Zera H. Lowe, Assistant, for petitioner. Dianna T. Dryden, for respondent. Page 767 Deborah Maranville on behalf of Northwest Women’s Law Center, amicus curiae. […]

Read More

STATE v. ALCALA, 136 Wn.2d 1026 (1998)

969 P.2d 1064 STATE, RESPONDENT, v. ALCALA, PETITIONER. No. 66855-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 12, 1998 Petition for review of a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals, No. 15625-7-III, February 19, 1998. Denied November 12, 1998.

Read More

ANKENY v. POMEROY GRAIN GROWERS, INC., 170 Wn. 1 (1932)

15 P.2d 264 JOHN D. ANKENY, Respondent, v. POMEROY GRAIN GROWERS, INC., et al., Appellants. No. 23691. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 13, 1932. [1] PLEADING (16) — FORM AND ALLEGATIONS — CONSTRUCTION — LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION. Upon demurrer, a complaint is to be liberally construed, and even inferences from averments amounting to mere […]

Read More

STATE v. YOHANNES, 171 Wn.2d 1027 (2011)

257 P.3d 665 State, Respondent, v. Yohannes, Petitioner. No. 85648-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 9, 2011. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 63444-5-I, January 31, 2011, 159 Wn. App. 1044. Denied.

Read More

JUNTUNEN v. JUNTUNEN, 56 Wn.2d 686 (1960)

354 P.2d 916 MIRIAM JUNTUNEN, Respondent, v. AARNE JUNTUNEN, Appellant.[1] No. 35346.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. September 1, 1960. [1] Reported in 354 P.2d 916. [1] DIVORCE — GROUNDS — CRUELTY — PHYSICAL VIOLENCE. Acts of physical violence by a husband against his wife, are sufficient, in themselves, to bring him within the […]

Read More

IN RE ALL-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., 70 Wn.2d 657 (1967)

425 P.2d 16 In the Matter of the Appeal of ALL-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. ALL-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent, v. JOHN F. GORDON, Appellant.[*] Nos. 38279, 38252.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. March 9, 1967. [*] Reported in 425 P.2d 16. [1] Unemployment Compensation — Findings of Commissioner — Judicial Review. When an assessment […]

Read More

STATE v. IRVIN, 41 Wn.2d 598 (1952)

250 P.2d 983 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. THEODORE A. IRVIN, Appellant.[1] No. 32169.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. December 4, 1952. [1] Reported in 250 P.2d 983. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — APPEAL — DECISIONS REVIEWABLE — INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS. An order denying a motion to dismiss an information on the ground that the […]

Read More

AUTO INTERURBAN CO. v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, 153 Wn. 479 (1929)

279 P. 738 AUTO INTERURBAN COMPANY, Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS et al., Appellants, L.P. VOWELS et al., Respondents. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS et al., Appellants, L.P. VOWELS et al., Respondents. No. 21465. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 20, 1929. [1] CARRIERS (3-2) — REGULATION — […]

Read More

STATE v. BADDA, 68 Wn.2d 50 (1966)

411 P.2d 411 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. EDWARD CHARLES BADDA, Appellant.[*] No. 37709.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. February 24, 1966. [*] Reported in 411 P.2d 411. [1] Criminal Law — Proof of Charge — Testimony of Accomplices — Sufficiency. The state has met its burden of proof in a prosecution for […]

Read More

STATE v. WESTMARK, 135 Wn.2d 1013 (1998)

960 P.2d 938 State, Respondent, v. Westmark, Petitioner. No. 66520-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 8, 1998. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, January 12, 1998, 88 Wn. App. 1073. Denied July 8, 1998. Page 1014

Read More

BIXLER v. BOWMAN, 94 Wn.2d 146 (1980)

614 P.2d 1290 CLIFTON BIXLER, ET AL, Respondents, v. HOWARD R. BOWMAN, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 46813.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 7, 1980. [1] Statutes — Construction — Legislative Intent — Prior Acts and Constructions. The legislature is presumed to be familiar with judicial interpretations of its prior acts. [2] Physicians and […]

Read More

IN RE JOHNSON, 71 Wn.2d 245 (1967)

427 P.2d 968 In the Matter of JANGABA AUGUSTINE JOHNSON. J.M. WHEELER, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE BOARD AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, Respondent.[*] No. 38515.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 15, 1967. [*] Reported in 427 P.2d 968. [1] Civil Rights — Remedies — Compulsory Reporting — Self-Incrimination. RCW 49.60.250 and 49.60.310, under which the Board […]

Read More

LAUGHNEY v. MAYBURY, 145 Wn. 146 (1927)

259 P. 17 A.M. LAUGHNEY, Appellant, v. CHARLES MAYBURY, as Director of Licenses, et al., Respondents. No. 20523. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 6, 1927. [1] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (48) — PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS (1) — POLICE POWER — PRACTICE OF MEDICINE — REGULATION. Statutes regulating the practice of medicine concern the health, comfort […]

Read More

NATIONAL GROCERY CO. v. SANTAELLA CO., 160 Wn. 262 (1931)

295 P. 128 NATIONAL GROCERY COMPANY, Respondent, v. A. SANTAELLA COMPANY, Appellant. No. 22220. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 8, 1931. [1] PRINCIPAL AND AGENT (11-1) — THE RELATION — TERMINATION. An exclusive sales contract for the sale and distribution of defendant’s cigars on standing orders, without any time limit, is terminable at […]

Read More

CROFTON v. BARGREEN, 53 Wn.2d 243 (1958)

332 P.2d 1081 WILLIAM CROFTON et al., Respondents, v. HOWARD S. BARGREEN, Appellant.[1] No. 34409.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. December 10, 1958. [1] Reported in 332 P.2d 1081. [1] PARTNERS — DISSOLUTION — ACTIONS BETWEEN PARTNERS — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY KNOWLEDGE OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST. In an action to recover the balance allegedly due […]

Read More

BENNOR v. OREGON-WASHINGTON R. N. CO., 175 Wn. 559 (1933)

27 P.2d 1082 JOSEPH BENNOR, Appellant, v. OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD NAVIGATION COMPANY, Respondent. No. 24726. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 18, 1933. [1] COURTS (38) — RULE OF DECISION — DECISION OF U.S. COURTS AS AUTHORITY. The Federal cases as to what constitutes employment in interstate commerce are controlling in state courts. [2] MASTER […]

Read More

CROWN CASCADE, INC. v. O’NEAL, 100 Wn.2d 256 (1983)

668 P.2d 585 CROWN CASCADE, INC., Respondent, v. ART O’NEAL, ET AL, Appellants. No. 49208-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 31, 1983. [1] Statutes — Construction — Meaning of Words — “Shall.” The use of the term “shall” in a statute creates a presumption that the Legislature intended to create a duty rather […]

Read More

STATE v. CARLSON, 50 Wn.2d 220 (1957)

310 P.2d 867 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RAY CHRISTIAN CARLSON, Appellant.[1] No. 33921.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 2, 1957. [1] Reported in 310 P.2d 867. [1] ROBBERY — STATUTORY PROVISIONS — MEANS OF COMMITTING ROBBERY. Under RCW 9.75.010, which defines robbery as “the unlawful taking of personal property . . […]

Read More

VERNON v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOCIETY, 15 Wn.2d 94 (1942)

129 P.2d 801 LILLIAN AMELIA VERNON, Respondent, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY, Appellant.[1] No. 28508.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. October 9, 1942. [1] Reported in 129 P.2d 801. [1] ESTOPPEL — GROUNDS — INCONSISTENCY OF CONDUCT — REASON FOR TERMINATION OF CONTRACT. One may not mislead his adversary by assigning a false reason […]

Read More