219 P.2d 79 LAURETTA KELLY, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. O.G. CARROLL et al., Appellants.[1] No. 31182.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 31, 1950. [1] Reported in 219 P.2d 79. [1] PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS — CAPACITY AND QUALIFICATIONS — DRUGLESS HEALERS. A drugless healer is not a doctor. [2] SAME — LIMITATIONS UPON PRACTICE. […]
Category: Washington Supreme Court Opinions
STATE v. WRIGHT, 159 Wn.2d 1014 (2007)
State, Respondent, v. Wright, Petitioner. State, Respondent, v. Garrett, Defendant, Bryant, Petitioner. Nos. 78465-5 and 78788-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 8, 2007. Petitions for review of decisions of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 57086-2-I, 57087-1-I, and 55745-9-I, January 30 and May 8, 2006, 131 Wn. App. 474 and 132 Wn. App. 1056. Granted.
WHEELER v. FRUHLING, 54 Wn.2d 483 (1959)
341 P.2d 874 GUY F. WHEELER et al., Respondents, v. M.H. FRUHLING et al., Appellants.[1] No. 34976.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. July 9, 1959. [1] Reported in 341 P.2d 874. [1] DEEDS — CONSTRUCTION — PROPERTY CONVEYED — PARTICULAR DESCRIPTION — UNIT OF MEASURE. In an action to quiet title to real property […]
WHITE v. HOLM, 73 Wn.2d 348 (1968)
438 P.2d 581 ETTA A. WHITE, Respondent, v. RICHARD B. HOLM et al., Appellants.[*] No. 39267.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. March 14, 1968. [*] Reported in 438 P.2d 581. [1] Judgment — Default Judgment — Vacation — Proceedings — Nature. Although not a proceeding in equity, a proceeding to set aside a default […]
STATE v. STENGER, 111 Wn.2d 516 (1988)
760 P.2d 357 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RUSSELL FRANCIS STENGER, Petitioner. No. 54965-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 2, 1988. [1] Prosecuting Attorneys — Conflict of Interest — Disqualification — Previous Representation of Defendant. Under RPC 1.9(a) the prosecuting attorney of a county is disqualified from acting in a criminal case […]
IN RE PIERCY, 101 Wn.2d 490 (1984)
681 P.2d 223 In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of RONALD PIERCY, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 50151-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 26, 1984. [1] Statutes — Construction — Multiple Provisions. A court must consider all statutory provisions relating to the same subject and harmonize them so as to give a proper […]
CODD v. CROWLEY CO., 162 Wn. 650 (1931)
299 P. 366 AMBROSE CODD, Respondent, v. CROWLEY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 22899. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 19, 1931. [1] SALES (25) — CONSTRUCTION — PROVISIONS OF WRITTEN CONTRACT — APPLICATION OF UNIFORM SALES ACT. The express provision of a contract for the manufacture of lumber, governed by the rules of a manufacturers’ […]
STATE v. TURNER, 165 Wn.2d 1002 (2008)
State, Respondent, v. Turner, Petitioner. No. 81626-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 2, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 33678-2-II, April 29, 2008, 144 Wn. App. 279. Granted.
COSSEL v. SKAGIT COUNTY, 119 Wn.2d 434 (1992)
834 P.2d 609 WILLIAM F. COSSEL, Appellant, v. SKAGIT COUNTY, Respondent. No. 58784-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. July 16, 1992. [1] Statutes — Construction — Codifications — Headings and Captions — Status. Statutory headings generated by the code reviser do not change the meaning of the statute unless they are specifically enacted by […]
STATE v. HULL, 78 Wn.2d 984 (1971)
481 P.2d 902 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. ROY HULL et al., Respondents.[*] No. 41816.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. March 11, 1971. [*] Reported in 481 P.2d 902. [1] Witnesses — Attendance — Compulsory Testimony — In General. When properly called upon, citizens have a duty to testify in the course of […]
STATE v. LIDGE, 111 Wn.2d 845 (1989)
765 P.2d 1292 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. CHARLES RAY LIDGE, ET AL, Defendants, DEVON ANTONIO ESKRIDGE, Respondent. No. 54424-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 6, 1989. [1] Juveniles — Juvenile Justice — Jurisdiction — Adult or Juvenile — Delay in Charging — Due Process — Test. Although a criminal defendant is […]
STATE v. VERMILLION, 150 Wn.2d 1036 (2004)
State, Respondent, v. Vermillion, Petitioner. No. 74234-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 4, 2004. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 47308-5-I, April 21, 2003, 116 Wn. App. 1042. Denied.
BOSWORTH v. WOLFE, 146 Wn. 615 (1928)
264 P. 413 MAUDE WOLFE BOSWORTH et al., Respondents, v. CLARA WOLFE, Appellant. No. 20992. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 20, 1928. [1] MONEY RECEIVED (3, 4, 6) — FROM THIRD PERSONS — PERSONS ENTITLED AND LIABLE. An action for money had and received may be maintained by the beneficiaries in a life […]
THOMAS v. HENSEL, 38 Wn.2d 457 (1951)
230 P.2d 290 JOSEPHINE THOMAS, Appellant, v. CHARLES C. HENSEL, as Executor, Respondent.[1] No. 31544.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 19, 1951. [1] Reported in 230 P.2d 290. [1] WILLS — CONTRACTS TO DEVISE — EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH. In order to establish an oral contract to devise, it must be shown by evidence […]
IN RE ESTATE OF PEARMAN, 152 Wn.2d 1023 (2004)
In re Estate of Pearman. Hudson, Individually, and as Guardian, et al., Petitioners, v. Dore, as Personal Representative, Respondent. No. 75294-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 3, 2004. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 50303-1-I and 50880-6-I, February 23, 2004, 120 Wn. App. 1024. Denied.
HAZEL v. VAN BEEK, 135 Wn.2d 45 (1998)
954 P.2d 1301 LOIS HAZEL, Petitioner, v. LEONARD VAN BEEK, ET AL., Respondents. No. 65472-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued March 10, 1998. Decided April 23, 1998. Page 46 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 47 Appeal from the […]
SYMINGTON v. HUDSON, 40 Wn.2d 331 (1952)
243 P.2d 484 D.D. SYMINGTON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM W. HUDSON et al., Respondents.[1] No. 31809.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 17, 1952. [1] Reported in 243 P.2d 484. [1] QUIETING TITLE — RIGHT OF ACTION — CHARACTER OF ADVERSE CLAIM. The statutes relating to actions to quiet title have enlarged the equity jurisdiction […]
STATE v. ALSETH, 170 Wn.2d 1031 (2011)
249 P.3d 623 State, Respondent, v. Alseth, Petitioner. No. 85267-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 2, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 64136-1-1, September 27, 2010, 157 Wn. App. 1072. Denied.
STATE v. BATKE, 156 Wn.2d 1027 (2006)
133 P.3d 473 State, Respondent, v. Batke, Petitioner. No. 77577-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 4, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 55111-6-I, July 25, 2005, 128 Wn. App. 1051. Denied.
STATE v. SPEAKS, 119 Wn.2d 204 (1992)
829 P.2d 1096 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. TROY DEAN SPEAKS, Petitioner. No. 58706-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 21, 1992. [1] Constitutional Law — Appeal — Review — Constitutional Issues — Avoidance. There is a well-established policy that an appellate court should decline to decide a constitutional issue if it is […]
STATE v. BATTLE, 166 Wn.2d 1003 (2009)
208 P.3d 1123 State, Respondent, v. Battle, Petitioner. No. 82524-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 2, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 61013-9-I, November 10, 2008, 147 Wn. App. 1021. Denied.
BEKINS v. FIDELITY SAVINGS LOAN ASSN., 179 Wn. 519 (1934)
38 P.2d 246 DANIEL BEKINS et al., Appellants, v. FIDELITY SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION et al., Respondents. No. 25122. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 4, 1934. [1] BANKRUPTCY (3) — CONFLICTING JURISDICTION OF COURTS OF BANKRUPTCY AND STATE COURTS. The state court does not lose jurisdiction of a mortgage foreclosure by a subsequent filing […]
BUXEL v. KING COUNTY, 60 Wn.2d 404 (1962)
374 P.2d 250 EMELIE BUXEL, Respondent, v. KING COUNTY, Appellant.[*] No. 36107.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. August 23, 1962. [*] Reported in 374 P.2d 250. [1] LIMITATION OF ACTIONS — COMPUTATION OF PERIOD — CONTINUING INVASION OF PROPERTY — ACTS RESULTING IN INCREASED DAMAGE. Where a surface water drainage system, which had previously […]
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 138 Wn.2d 1019 (1999)
The Supreme Court of Washington. 1999. State, Respondent, v. Gonzalez, Petitioner, No. 68086-8. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, April 1, 1999, 94 Wn. App. 1059. Denied September 28, 1999. In re Welfare of H.S. B.S., et al., Petitioners, v. Department of Soc. Health Servs., Respondent, No. 68087-6. Petition for […]
STATE v. STAMATIS, 137 Wn. 106 (1925)
241 P. 659 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES STAMATIS, Appellant. No. 19469. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 22, 1925. [1] INDICTMENT AND INFORMATION (107) — WAIVER OF DEFECTS — SURPLUSAGE — CURE BY EVIDENCE. An improper allegation against a jointist, alleging a previous conviction of violation of the liquor laws, on […]
CELIAN v. COAST FINANCE CORP., 189 Wn. 676 (1937)
66 P.2d 363 HERMAN G. CELIAN et al., Respondents, v. COAST FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 26295. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 6, 1937. [1] USURY (6) — BILLS AND NOTES. A note for $2,400 payable in one year with interest at eight per cent, for which the maker received only $2,000, is tainted […]
STATE EX REL. v. PUB. SERVICE COMM., 54 Wn.2d 382 (1959)
340 P.2d 784 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Adams Transport, Inc. et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants, v. THE WASHINGTON PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al., Appellants.[1] No. 35029.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. June 25, 1959. [1] Reported in 340 P.2d 784. [1] AUTOMOBILES — CARRIERS — REGULATION — ABANDONMENT OF PERMIT […]
WOLFF CO. v. RILEY, 24 Wn.2d 62 (1945)
163 P.2d 179 GEORGE J. WOLFF COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. E.B. RILEY, as Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation and Placement, Appellant.[1] No. 29395.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 3, 1945. [1] Reported in 163 P.2d 179. [1] UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION — PARTIES WITHIN PURVIEW OF ACT — EMPLOYERS — STATUTORY PROVISIONS. On an issue […]
TROSPER v. HEFFNER, 51 Wn.2d 268 (1957)
317 P.2d 530 HOMER E. TROSPER et al., Respondents, v. J.M. HEFFNER et al., Appellants.[1] No. 34210.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 7, 1957. [1] Reported in 317 P.2d 530. [1] TRIAL — CONDUCT OF COUNSEL — SHOWING INDEMNITY INSURANCE. In an action for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident, the plaintiff […]
STATE v. SCOTT, 93 Wn.2d 7 (1980)
604 P.2d 943 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHNIE WILLIAM SCOTT, ET AL, Appellants. Nos. 45055, 45334.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 3, 1980. [1] Arrest — Probable Cause — Determination — Specially Trained Person. Probable cause for a warrantless arrest exists when a police officer has a real belief, based on […]
STATE v. MCCHRISTIAN, 171 Wn.2d 1003 (2011)
249 P.3d 182 State, Respondent, v. McChristian, Petitioner. No. 85307-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 1, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 39027-2-II, November 2, 2010, 158 Wn. App. 392. Dispositions of Petitions For Review and Selected Motions For Discretionary Review Denied.
STATE v. NELSON, 92 Wn.2d 862 (1979)
601 P.2d 1276 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL G. NELSON, Petitioner. No. 46012.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 1, 1979. [1] Criminal Law — Punishment — Probation — Authority. A trial court’s power to grant probation to a convicted defendant, or to suspend the imposition or execution of his sentence, derives […]
STATE v. BLACK, 157 Wn.2d 1010 (2006)
139 P.3d 349 STATE, Respondent v. BLACK, Petitioner. No. 77886-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 6, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 54408-0-I, August 29, 2005, 129 Wn. App. 1013. Denied.
GOEMMER v. WILLIS, 149 Wn.2d 1007 (2003)
Goemmer, Petitioner, v. Willis, et al., Respondents. No. 72690-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 29, 2003. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 20096-5-III, March 1, 2002. Denied April 29, 2003.
FAY v. ALLIED STORES CORP., 43 Wn.2d 512 (1953)
262 P.2d 189 THERESA FAY, Respondent, v. ALLIED STORES CORPORATION, Appellant.[1] No. 32399.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. October 19, 1953. [1] Reported in 262 P.2d 189. [1] STATUTES — CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION — RETROACTIVE OPERATION. As a general rule, statutes will be given prospective effect; however, exceptions are made where retroactivity is expressed […]
STATE v. NAITOKO, 163 Wn.2d 1013 (2008)
180 P.3d 1291 State, Respondent, v. Naitoko, Petitioner. No. 80254-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 1, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 57456-6-I, April 2, 2007, 137 Wn. App. 1055. Denied.
ROBBINS v. HUNTLEY CATTLE CO., 3 Wn.2d 203 (1940)
100 P.2d 386 CHARLES P. ROBBINS, Appellant, v. HUNTLEY CATTLE COMPANY et al., Respondents.[1] No. 27536.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. March 19, 1940. [1] Reported in 100 P.2d 386. [1] COSTS — PERSONS LIABLE — JOINT DEFENDANTS — DISCRETION OF COURT. In an equitable action by a shareholders’ agent of an insolvent bank […]
FARMERS INS. CO. v. REES, 96 Wn.2d 679 (1982)
638 P.2d 580 FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM REES, Appellant, JOHN J. McLEOD, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 47585-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 7, 1982. [1] Costs — Attorney Fees — In General. Attorney fees will not be awarded unless authorized by statute, contract, or equitable policy. [2] Insurance — […]
MATIA INV. FUND, INC. v. CITY OF TACOMA, 157 Wn.2d 1016 (2006)
141 P.3d 642 Matia Inv. Fund, Inc., Petitioner, v. City of Tacoma, Respondent. No. 77867-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 10, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32189-1-II, September 13, 2005, 129 Wn. App. 541. Review granted March 7, 2006, and consolidated under Morin v. Burris, No. 77291-6.
MCLAUGHLIN v. WATERCRAFT INT’L, INC., 135 Wn.2d 1005 (1998)
959 P.2d 125 McLaughlin, Respondent, v. Watercraft Int’l, Inc., et al., Petitioners. No. 66294-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 3, 1998. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, September 2, 1997, 87 Wn. App. 1051. Denied June 3, 1998.
IN RE 1934 DEED TO CAMP KILWORTH ET AL., 166 Wn.2d 1021 (2009)
217 P.3d 335 In re 1934 Deed to Camp Kilworth et al. No. 82912-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 8, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 37015-8-II, February 24, 2009, 149 Wn. App. 82. Denied.
STATE v. ADAMS, 136 Wn.2d 1007 (1998)
966 P.2d 901 State, Respondent, v. Adams, Petitioner. No. 66656-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 2, 1998. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 38279-9-I, December 11, 1997. Denied September 2, 1998.
STATE v. SHOTT, 160 Wn.2d 1002 (2007)
158 P.3d 614 State, Respondent, v. Shott, Petitioner. No. 78981-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 1, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 54359-8-I, May 22, 2006, 132 Wn. App. 1061 Denied.
BLOXOM v. HENNEFORD, 193 Wn. 540 (1938)
76 P.2d 586 MERRITT BLOXOM et al., Respondents, v. H.H. HENNEFORD et al., Appellants. No. 26878. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 23, 1938. [1] LICENSES — OCCUPATION TAX — PRODUCE JOBBERS — PURCHASE PRICE — DEDUCTIONS. In the Laws of 1935, p. 716, § 8 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8370-8), imposing an […]
IN RE OLSON’S ESTATE, 194 Wn. 219 (1938)
77 P.2d 781 In the Matter of the Estate of SAM OLSON, Deceased. MILDRED M. OLSON, as Administratrix, Appellant, v. MELKER OLSON et al., Respondents. No. 26870. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 31, 1938. [1] DOMICILE — INTENT — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. The evidence sustains findings that a husband and wife who had […]
IN RE DISCIPLINE OF McCORMICK, 131 Wn.2d 1014 (1997)
In re Discipline of McCormick. No. 03802-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 5, 1997. Petition for review of a decision of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association. Denied March 5, 1997.
PATE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., 43 Wn.2d 185 (1953)
260 P.2d 901 CARL PATE, Respondent, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al., Appellants.[1] No. 32314.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. September 4, 1953. [1] Reported in 260 P.2d 901. [1] NEGLIGENCE — NATURE AND ELEMENTS. The essential elements of actionable negligence are the existence of a duty, a breach thereof, and a resulting injury. […]
BERG v. SETTLE, 70 Wn.2d 864 (1967)
425 P.2d 635 JOHN J. BERG, Respondent, v. JOHN W. SETTLE, JR., Appellant.[*] No. 38559.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. March 23, 1967. [*] Reported in 425 P.2d 635. [1] Partnership — Dissolution — Valuation of Assets — Market Value. It was not error for the trial court to value the interest of a […]
STATE v. DIAZ, 160 Wn.2d 1023 (2007)
163 P.3d 794 State, Respondent, v. Diaz, Petitioner. No. 79318-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 11, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 55991-5-I, July 24, 2006, 134 Wn. App. 1007. Denied.
FORD v. NOKOMIS STATE BANK, 135 Wn. 37 (1925)
237 P. 314 A.M. FORD, Respondent, v. NOKOMIS STATE BANK, Appellant. No. 18780. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 9, 1925. EXECUTION (73-1) — REDEMPTION — LIEN OF DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT ON REDEMPTION BY GRANTEE OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR. Under Rem. Comp. Stat., § 595, authorizing the judgment debtor or his successor in interest to redeem […]
STATE EX REL. KENNEDY v. REEVES, 22 Wn.2d 677 (1945)
157 P.2d 721 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Kathryn H. Kennedy et al., Plaintiff, v. BELLE REEVES, as Secretary of State, Respondent.[1] No. 29625.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 2, 1945. [1] Reported in 157 P.2d 721. [1] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — JUDICIAL POWERS — ENCROACHMENT ON LEGISLATURE — VALIDITY OF […]
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON, 72 Wn.2d 415 (1967)
433 P.2d 217 VERNA PAULINE JOHNSON, Appellant, v. FRANK CHARLES JOHNSON, Respondent.[*] No. 39301.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. November 2, 1967. [*] Reported in 433 P.2d 217. [1] Divorce — Custody of Children — Disposition on Appeal. Upon review of an order awarding custody of a child, the Supreme Court remanded the matter […]
LOURING v. LOURING, 199 Wn. 351 (1939)
91 P.2d 729 AGNES LOURING, Appellant, v. KAJ A. LOURING, Respondent. No. 27233. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 23, 1939. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — RECORD — STATEMENT OF FACTS — FORM AND CONTENTS — CONFLICTING VERSIONS OF EVIDENCE. It is the province of the trial judge, and not of the supreme court, […]
IN RE A MINOR, 29 Wn.2d 759 (1948)
189 P.2d 458 In the Matter of the Adoption of a Minor.[1] No. 30322.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 2, 1948. [1] Reported in 189 P.2d 458. [1] BASTARDS — ILLEGITIMACY — CHILD BORN DURING WEDLOCK — EVIDENCE — PRESUMPTION OF LEGITIMACY. While there is a strong presumption that a child born during […]
STATE EX REL. THIELICKE v. SUPERIOR COURT, 9 Wn.2d 309 (1941)
114 P.2d 1001 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Vera Thielicke et al., Plaintiff, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THURSTON COUNTY, D.F. Wright, Judge, Respondent.[1] No. 28405.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. June 27, 1941. [1] Reported in 114 P.2d 1001. [1] STATES — ACTIONS — LIABILITY TO BE SUED — CONDITIONS […]
IN RE YAMAGIWA, 97 Wn.2d 773 (1982)
650 P.2d 203 In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against ROBERT H. YAMAGIWA, an Attorney at Law. No. C.D. 8190.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 26, 1982. [1] Attorney and Client — Discipline — Suspension — Notification of Clients — Necessity. DRA 6.7(a) requires a suspended attorney to notify all his clients […]
PARKS v. LEPLEY, 160 Wn. 287 (1931)
294 P. 1020 E.W. PARKS, Appellant, v. AUGUST LEPLEY, Respondent. No. 22370. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 9, 1931. [1] GARNISHMENT (32-2, 35) — SET-OFF AND COUNTERCLAIM (7) — LIABILITY OF GARNISHEE — NATURE OF DEBT. A lessee is entitled to set off taxes and assessments payable by the lessor against rentals due, […]
GEORGIA-PAC. ETC. v. DEPT. L. I., 47 Wn.2d 893 (1955)
290 P.2d 718 GEORGIA-PACIFIC PLYWOOD COMPANY, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Defendant, LIEF T. RISE, Appellant.[1] No. 33228.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. November 25, 1955. [1] Reported in 290 P.2d 718. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — AGGRAVATION OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In an industrial insurance proceeding to establish […]
KALTREIDER v. CMTY. HOSP., 168 Wn.2d 1039 (2010)
Kaltreider, Petitioner, v. Lake Chelan Cmty. Hosp., Respondent. No. 84144-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 2, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 27969-3-III, December 22, 2009, 153 Wn. App. 762. Granted.
MULCAHY v. FARMERS INS. CO., 152 Wn.2d 92 (2004)
95 P.3d 313 MARY MULCAHY, Petitioner, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, ET AL., Respondents. No. 73647-2.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued January 13, 2004. Decided July 15, 2004. Page 93 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 94 Mary Mulcahy, pro […]
STATE v. RUFF, 122 Wn.2d 731 (1993)
861 P.2d 1063 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL E. RUFF, Petitioner. No. 60538-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 18, 1993. [1] Criminal Law — Statutes — Validity — Standing To Challenge. A person prosecuted under a criminal statute has standing to challenge the validity of the statute in the context of […]
MERRICK v. SEARS, ROEBUCK CO., 67 Wn.2d 426 (1965)
407 P.2d 960 JOE MERRICK et al., Appellants, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK COMPANY, Respondent.[*] No. 37708.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 18, 1965. [*] Reported in 407 P.2d 960. [1] Trial — Taking Case From Jury — Sufficiency of Evidence. A motion to dismiss admits the truth of the opposing party’s evidence and all […]
KING v. CANN, 184 Wn. 554 (1935)
52 P.2d 900 LEONA KING, a Minor, by C.E. King, her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. J.A. CANN et al., Appellants. No. 25834. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 9, 1935. [1] MASTER AND SERVANT (174, 182) — INJURY TO THIRD PERSON — SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT — FAMILY CAR DOCTRINE — EVIDENCE […]
MORROW v. MORROW, 179 Wn. 329 (1934)
37 P.2d 692 GRACE G. MORROW, Appellant, v. CLYDE O. MORROW, Respondent, JAMES GRAY MORROW et al., Interveners-respondents. No. 25109. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 15, 1934. [1] NEW TRIAL (35, 37) — GROUNDS — NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE — DILIGENCE — CUMULATIVE EVIDENCE. A motion for a new trial for newly discovered evidence […]
STATE v. JOHNSON, 131 Wn.2d 1010 (1997)
State, Respondent, v. Johnson, Petitioner. No. 64726-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 5, 1997. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, October 4, 1996, 83 Wn. App. 1032. Denied March 5, 1997.
HANSEN v. SULLIVAN, 184 Wn. 538 (1935)
52 P.2d 895 HOWARD H. HANSEN, as Supervisor of Banking, Appellant, v. P.E. SULLIVAN et al., Respondents. No. 25715. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 3, 1935. [1] BANKS AND BANKING (10, 14) — FUNCTIONS AND DEALINGS — POWERS — WRONGFUL ACTS OF AGENTS — SCOPE OF CASHIER’S POWERS. A bank cashier, in advising […]
YAKIMA FRUIT GROWERS ASS’N v. COLE, 162 Wn. 510 (1931)
298 P. 707 YAKIMA FRUIT GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. GEORGE B. COLE et al., Respondents. No. 22963. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 8, 1931. [1] CROPS (2) — LANDLORD AND TENANT (57) — OWNERSHIP OF CROPS — TITLE. A lessee of an orchard, who sublet the same in the interest of the owners […]
IN RE BEHRENS, 24 Wn.2d 125 (1945)
163 P.2d 587 In the Matter of the Application of ALBERT BEHRENS for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.[1] No. 29706.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 15, 1945. [1] Reported in 163 P.2d 587. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — PUNISHMENT — EFFECT OF STATUTE CHANGING PUNISHMENT — EX POST FACTO APPLICATION. One accused and convicted […]
MURRAY v. KAUFFMAN BUICK CO., 197 Wn. 469 (1938)
85 P.2d 1061 DENISE LARSON MURRAY, Appellant, v. KAUFFMAN BUICK COMPANY, Respondent. No. 27201. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 28, 1938. [1] MASTER AND SERVANT — LIABILITY FOR INJURIES TO THIRD PERSONS — SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT — QUESTION FOR JURY. In an action against the owner of an automobile and its driver in […]
ISOM v. CLARK, 165 Wn.2d 1013 (2009)
Isom et al., Respondents, v. Clark et al., Petitioners. No. 81836-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 6, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 26281-2-III, June 19, 2008, 145 Wn. App. 1017. Denied.
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[†] , 122 Wn.2d 1018 (1993)
The Supreme Court of Washington. [†] Dispositions of Court of Appeals Commissioner rulings are identified by case names not in italic. State, Respondent, v. Martin, Petitioner, No. 60608-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, May 10, 1993, 69 Wn. App. 1073. Denied November 3, 1993. State, Respondent, v. Heath, Petitioner, […]
STATE EX REL. WASH. TOLL B. ETC. v. YELLE, 197 Wn. 110 (1938)
84 P.2d 688 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of the Washington Toll Bridge Authority et al., Plaintiff, v. CLIFF YELLE, as State Auditor, Respondent, F. BRONEMANN et al., Interveners. No. 27375. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 28, 1938. [1] BRIDGES — ESTABLISHMENT BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES — APPROACHES AS PART OF BRIDGE. […]
REPUBLICAN PARTY v. PDC, 141 Wn.2d 245 (2000)
4 P.3d 808 WASHINGTON STATE REPUBLICAN PARTY, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON STATE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMISSION, GARY MAEHARA, Chair, and SUSAN BRADY, RHONDA CAHILL and RONALD MEYERS, Commissioners of the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, in their individual capacities, MELISSA WARHEIT, Executive Director of the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, in her individual capacity, and CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, […]
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 111 Wn.2d 1016 (1988)
The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Hutchinson, Petitioner, No. 55383-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, June 15, 1988, 51 Wn. App. 1063. Denied October 4, 1988. State, Respondent, v. Melrose, Petitioner, No. 55386-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, June 21, 1988, […]
STATE v. STRUTTON, 136 Wn.2d 1029 (1998)
972 P.2d 465 State, Respondent, v. Strutton, Petitioner. No. 66970-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. Denied December 1, 1998. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, May 18, 1998, 90 Wn. App. 1055.
STATE v. GEBRE, 150 Wn.2d 1022 (2003)
State, Respondent, v. Gebre, Defendant, Wanzo, Petitioner. No. 74065-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. December 2, 2003. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 50268-9-I, April 28, 2003, 116 Wn. App. 1050. Denied.
NORTHWEST LUM. CO. v. SCANDINAVIAN-AM. BANK, 132 Wn. 449 (1925)
231 P. 951 NORTHWEST LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent, v. THE SCANDINAVIAN-AMERICAN BANK OF SEATTLE et al., Appellants. No. 18144. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 9, 1925. BANKS AND BANKING (6-1) — INTEREST (2) — IMPLIED CONTRACT — RIGHTS OF SPECIAL DEPOSITORS ON INSOLVENCY. Upon a recovery from the receiver of an insolvent bank of […]
IN RE PERSONAL RESTRAINT PETITION OF BECKER, 143 Wn.2d 491 (2001)
20 P.3d 409 In re the Personal Restraint Petition of PAUL J. BECKER, Petitioner. No. 68700-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Oral Argument Date: October 19, 2000. Filed: April 5, 2001. Page 492 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 493 […]
ADVANCED SILICON v. GRANT COUNTY, 156 Wn.2d 84 (2005)
124 P.3d 294 ADVANCED SILICON MATERIALS, L.L.C., Respondent, v. GRANT COUNTY, Petitioner. No. 75641-4.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued May 19, 2005. Decided December 8, 2005. Page 85 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 86 John D. Knodell, Prosecuting Attorney, and […]
McCRAY v. McCRAY, 56 Wn.2d 73 (1960)
350 P.2d 1006 JACK A. McCRAY, Appellant, v. BARBARA E. McCRAY, Respondent.[1] No. 35010.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 14, 1960. [1] Reported in 350 P.2d 1006. [1] DIVORCE — CUSTODY OF CHILDREN — MODIFICATION OF DECREE — GROUNDS — FINDING THAT PETITIONING PARTY IS FIT PERSON. In a proceeding brought by the […]
SEATTLE v. PRATT, 151 Wn. 700 (1929)
276 P. 1119 THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. JESSE PRATT, Appellant. No. 21658. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 8, 1929. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jones, J., entered October 26, 1928, upon a trial and conviction of violating a taxicab ordinance. Affirmed. William A. Gilmore and […]
HOWLEY v. FREDRICY, 197 Wn. 311 (1938)
85 P.2d 259 FANNIE R. HOWLEY, as Executrix, Respondent, v. ALICE FREDRICY, as Executrix, Appellant. No. 27168. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 12, 1938. [1] ATTORNEY AND CLIENT — COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY — VALUE OF SERVICES — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In an action for attorney’s fees over a period of years in settling […]
KELLEY v. COHEN, 152 Wn. 1 (1929)
277 P. 74 JAMES T. KELLEY et al., Respondents, v. SARAH COHEN, as Executrix, Appellant. No. 21564. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 1, 1929. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR (142) — PRESERVATION OF GROUNDS — INSTRUCTIONS — EXCEPTIONS. A claim of error cannot be based upon general exceptions to the instructions to the jury […]
STATE v. NELSON, 153 Wn.2d 1017 (2005)
State, Respondent, v. Nelson, Petitioner. No. 75712-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 1, 2005. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 52725-8-I, June 1, 2004, 121 Wn. App. 1068. Denied. Page 1018
STATE v. BARTHOLOMEW, 101 Wn.2d 631 (1984)
683 P.2d 1079 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DWAYNE EARL BARTHOLOMEW, Appellant. No. 48346-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 24, 1984. [1] Criminal Law — Punishment — Death Penalty — Aggravating Factors. Eighth Amendment requirements that aggravating circumstances reasonably justify imposition of the death penalty by genuinely narrowing the class of persons […]
STONE v. KNUTZEN, 147 Wn. 54 (1928)
265 P. 161 Z.S. STONE, by his Guardian ad litem L. Stone, Appellant, v. GEORGE KNUTZEN et al., Respondents. No. 20894. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 9, 1928. [1] INFANTS (14) — CONTRACTS — REPUDIATION. Under Rem. Comp. Stat., § 5830, a minor cannot disaffirm a contract on the ground of infancy, where, […]
GAVIN v. EVERTON, 19 Wn.2d 785 (1944)
144 P.2d 735 JOHN GAVIN et al., Respondents, v. LAURENCE E. EVERTON et al., Appellants.[1] No. 29122.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. January 17, 1944. [1] Reported in 144 P.2d 735. [1] AUTOMOBILES — LIABILITY FOR INJURIES — RIGHT OF WAY AT INTERSECTIONS — DUTY OF DISFAVORED DRIVER — DECEPTION. In an intersection collision […]
CARPENTER v. GOOLEY, 176 Wn. 67 (1934)
28 P.2d 264 EDWARD T. CARPENTER, Respondent, v. NINA GOOLEY et al., Appellants. No. 24551. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 4, 1934. [1] COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT (9) — IMPEACHMENT OR SETTING ASIDE — FRAUD — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. The settlement of a garnishment proceeding was induced by a fraudulent conspiracy and was not […]
HUFF v. HUFF, 178 Wn. 684 (1934)
35 P.2d 86 RAYMOND J. HUFF, Respondent, v. INEZ SUSAN HUFF, Appellant. No. 24972. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 4, 1934. [1] DIVORCE (15) — DEFENSES — RECRIMINATION — “LIKE” MISCONDUCT. The rule that a divorce will not be granted to a defendant guilty of like fault, does not apply where the wife […]
EMERY v. WENDELL BROWN AGENCY, 66 Wn.2d 521 (1965)
403 P.2d 671 DUANE EMERY, Respondent, v. WENDELL BROWN AGENCY, INC., Appellant.[*] No. 37544.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. June 24, 1965. [*] Reported in 403 P.2d 671. [1] Appeal and Error — Review — Verdict. The Supreme Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury where there is substantial evidence […]
IN RE MARRIAGE OF WARDWELL, 162 Wn.2d 1020 (2008)
178 P.3d 1034 In re Marriage of Wardwell. No. 80100-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 6, 2008. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 57554-6-I, January 22, 2007, 136 Wn. App. 1047. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary Review. Denied.
CLAYTON v. DEPT. LABOR IND., 48 Wn.2d 754 (1956)
296 P.2d 676 C.W. CLAYTON, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Appellant.[1] No. 33451.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 26, 1956. [1] Reported in 296 P.2d 676. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — PROCEEDINGS TO SECURE — HEARING AND TRIAL — NATURE OF CLAIM. In a proceeding for compensation for aggravation of permanent […]
BARTLETT v. HANTOVER, 84 Wn.2d 426 (1974)
526 P.2d 1217 JAMES BARTLETT, Respondent, v. BRUCE HANTOVER et al., Petitioners. No. 43031.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 3, 1974. [1] Negligence — Evidence — Subsequent Repairs. Evidence regarding safety measures taken after an injury has occurred is irrelevant when the defendant stipulates to the practicality of such measures and to dominion […]
DUROCHER v. KING COUNTY, 80 Wn.2d 139 (1972)
492 P.2d 547 BRUCE E. DUROCHER et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants, WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents. WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants, BRUCE E. DUROCHER, Respondent and Cross-appellant. No. 41919.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 6, 1972. [1] Counties — […]
STATE v. ALFREDO, 136 Wn.2d 1027 (1998)
969 P.2d 1065 STATE, RESPONDENT, v. ALFREDO M., JR., PETITIONER. No. 66730-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 13, 1998 Petition for review of a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals, March 5, 1998, 89 Wn. App. 1043. Granted November 13, 1998.
DICOMES v. STATE, 113 Wn.2d 612 (1989)
782 P.2d 1002 DEANNA DICOMES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents. No. 55887-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 31, 1989. [1] Master and Servant — Termination — Violation of Public Policy — Burden of Proof. A discharged employee who claims that the discharge contravened a clear mandate of public policy […]
BRITTON v. SAFECO INSURANCE, 104 Wn.2d 518 (1985)
707 P.2d 125 EDWARD F. BRITTON, Respondent, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellant. No. 51129-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 3, 1985. [1] Insurance — Statutory Provisions — Effect. Statutes regulating the business of insurance are a part of each individual insurance policy. [2] Insurance — Uninsured Motorist — Benefit Setoff — […]
STATE EX REL. WALLEN v. NOE, 78 Wn.2d 484 (1970)
475 P.2d 787 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Woodrow A. Wallen et al., Respondents, v. JUDGE NOE et al., Appellants.[*] No. 41623.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 22, 1970. [*] Reported in 475 P.2d 787. [1] Municipal Corporations — Ordinances — Validity — Presumptions. The presumption that a regularly enacted […]
STATE v. GORE, 101 Wn.2d 481 (1984)
681 P.2d 227 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHNIE LEE GORE, Petitioner. No. 49856-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 26, 1984. [1] Criminal Law — Statutes — Construction — Penal Statutes — Rule of Lenity. The rule of lenity requires that a criminal statute which is susceptible of more than one reasonable […]
STATE EX REL. BRONSON v. SUPERIOR COURT, 194 Wn. 339 (1938)
77 P.2d 997 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Robert E. Bronson et al., Plaintiff, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, Clay Allen, Judge, Respondent. No. 26999. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 8, 1938. [1] DISCOVERY — UNDER STATUTORY PROVISIONS — INTERROGATORIES TO ADVERSE PARTY — PURPOSES — DISCOVERY OF […]