HIGBEE v. SHOREWOOD OSTEOPATHIC HOSP., 105 Wn.2d 33 (1985)

711 P.2d 306 LOUISE HIGBEE, as Executrix, ET AL, Petitioners, v. SHOREWOOD OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL, ET AL, Respondents. No. 50644-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. December 12, 1985. [1] Damages — Death — Survival Action — Dependency — Necessity. Under RCW 4.20.060, which provides that a decedent’s right of action for personal injuries survives to […]

Read More

SEATTLE v. SEE, 67 Wn.2d 475 (1965)

408 P.2d 262 THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. NORMAN E. SEE, Appellant.[*] No. 37651.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. November 24, 1965. [*] Reported in 408 P.2d 262. [1] Municipal Corporations — Ordinances — Construction. A municipal ordinance providing that the fire chief may enter all buildings except dwellings for the purpose of […]

Read More

LUCAS v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO., 141 Wn. 504 (1927)

252 P. 526 ROBERT M. LUCAS, Respondent, v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Appellant. No. 19946. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 5, 1927. [1] CORPORATIONS (195) — ACTIONS AGAINST — VENUE — TRANSACTING BUSINESS. A steamship company transacted business, within the meaning of Rem. Comp. Stat., § 206, authorizing a suit in any county […]

Read More

SURRY v. BAKER, 132 Wn. 188 (1925)

231 P. 791 B.F. SURRY et al., Respondents, v. HARRY A. BAKER et al., Appellants, WM. A. DOELLE, as Trustee etc., Defendants. No. 18886. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 5, 1925. MORTGAGES (13) — EQUITABLE MORTGAGE — EXECUTORY CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF LAND — RIGHTS OF ASSIGNEE. An equitable mortgage is not created […]

Read More

PAPE v. ARMSTRONG, 47 Wn.2d 480 (1955)

287 P.2d 1018 EVA G. PAPE, Respondent, v. GRANT ARMSTRONG et al., Appellants.[1] No. 33248.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 22, 1955. [1] Reported in 287 P.2d 1018. [1] COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES — PROPERTY AND FUNDS — FUNDS TO PURCHASE OLD AGE ANNUITIES FOR EMPLOYEES — REPURCHASE — RIGHT TO PROCEEDS. Where the […]

Read More

STATE v. KING, 171 Wn.2d 1005 (2011)

249 P.3d 183 State, Respondent, v. King, Petitioner. No. 82982-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 2, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 60753-7-1, March 9, 2009, 149 Wn. App. 1012. Dispositions of Petitions For Review and Selected Motions For Discretionary Review Denied.

Read More

GRUGINSKI v. LANE, 177 Wn. 121 (1934)

30 P.2d 970 JOHN GRUGINSKI, Respondent, v. C.W. LANE et al., Appellants. No. 24951. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 2, 1934. [1] PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS (9, 10-1) — LIABILITY FOR MALPRACTICE — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. Findings of negligence in setting a broken arm and that the bad result was caused by failure to […]

Read More

OMSTEAD v. BRADER HEATERS, INC., 80 Wn.2d 720 (1972)

497 P.2d 1310 FRANK B. OMSTEAD, Respondent, v. BRADER HEATERS, INC., et al., Respondents, KUBOTA IRON AND MACHINERY WORKS, LTD., Petitioner. No. 42114.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. June 8, 1972. Review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, July 9, 1971, 5 Wn. App. 258. Affirmed. The Court of Appeals, granting certiorari, […]

Read More

CAMINITI v. BOYLE, 107 Wn.2d 662 (1987)

732 P.2d 989 BENELLA CAMINITI, ET AL, Petitioners, v. BRIAN J. BOYLE, ET AL, Respondents. No. 52459-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 12, 1987. [1] Waters — Tidelands — State Ownership — Constitutional Provisions. The state ownership of tidelands asserted in Const. art. 17, § 1 is the sovereignty and dominion aspect of […]

Read More

BOYLE v. DEPT. PUB. ASSISTANCE, 53 Wn.2d 828 (1959)

335 P.2d 478 JAMES BOYLE et al., Appellants, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE, Respondent.[1] No. 34569.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. February 13, 1959. [1] Reported in 335 P.2d 478. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, No. 132115, Cochran, J., entered October 23, 1957, sustaining an order of […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. FOLEY v. YUSE, 191 Wn. 1 (1937)

70 P.2d 797 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Ralph E. Foley, Prosecuting Attorney for Spokane County, Respondent, v. FRANK YUSE, as Justice of the Peace, Appellant. No. 26571. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 26, 1937. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — FORMER JEOPARDY — IDENTITY OF OFFENSES. To sustain a plea of […]

Read More

OVERLAKE HOSP. v. DEP’T OF HEALTH, 170 Wn.2d 43 (2010)

239 P.3d 1095 OVERLAKE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ET AL., Respondents, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL., Petitioners. No. 82728-1.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued May 20, 2010. Decided September 23, 2010. Page 44 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 45 Appeal […]

Read More

HEATON v. CHITTY, 146 Wn. 634 (1928)

264 P. 417 A.E. HEATON, as Trustee, Appellant, v. FRED CHITTY et al., Respondents. No. 20698. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 24, 1928. [1] BANKRUPTCY (5-1) — PREFERENCES BY BANKRUPT — TRANSFERS. A deed given by or in the interest of a bankrupt, on a sufficient consideration, for the release of a mortgage […]

Read More

HAHN v. HARTMAN, 153 Wn.2d 1011 (2005)

Hahn, Petitioner, v. Hartman et al., Respondents. No. 75651-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 1, 2005. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 22208-0-III, May 25, 2004, 121 Wn. App. 1059. Denied.

Read More

NEWELL v. VERVAEKE, 189 Wn. 144 (1937)

63 P.2d 488 A.S. NEWELL, Respondent, v. G. VERVAEKE et al., Appellants. No. 26243. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 7, 1937. [1] MINES AND MINERALS (20) — CONTRACTS AND CONVEYANCES — OPERATION — RIGHT TO LIEN — LIEN ON INTEREST OF VENDOR FOR IMPROVEMENTS BY PURCHASER. Where the holder of an option to […]

Read More

GUDMUNDSON v. COMMERCIAL BANK T. CO., 138 Wn. 355 (1926)

244 P. 676 S.K. GUDMUNDSON et al., Respondents, v. COMMERCIAL BANK TRUST COMPANY, et al., Appellants. No. 19581. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 1, 1926. [1] VENDOR AND PURCHASER (60, 73) — RESCISSION BY VENDEE — FRAUD — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. The evidence does not sustain findings of actionable fraudulent representations authorizing a […]

Read More

STATE v. STRONG, 171 Wn.2d 1010 (2011)

249 P.3d 1028 State, Respondent, v. Strong, Petitioner. No. 85430-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 29, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 39262-3-II, November 18, 2010, 158 Wn. App. 1043. Denied.

Read More

McDONALD v. SPOKANE COUNTY, 53 Wn.2d 685 (1959)

336 P.2d 127 CHARLES T. McDONALD, Appellant, v. SPOKANE COUNTY, Respondent.[1] No. 34397.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 5, 1959. [1] Reported in 336 P.2d 127. [1] COUNTIES — HIGHWAYS — CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT — DRAINAGE FACILITIES — DUTY OF COUNTY. In an action for personal injuries received when the plaintiff drove his […]

Read More

IN RE MILLER’S ESTATE, 150 Wn. 522 (1929)

273 P. 958 In the Matter of the Estate of VIRGINIA MILLER, Deceased. No. 21455. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 17, 1929. [1] APPEAL (268) — BILL OF EXCEPTIONS OR STATEMENT OF FACTS — EVIDENCE IN SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS — PROBATE OF WILL. In the absence of a bill of exceptions or statement of […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 110 Wn.2d 1009 (1988)

The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Cantu, Petitioner, No. 54702-5. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 18007-0-I, September 23, 1987. Denied March 1, 1988. Patrick, et al, Petitioners, v. Lee, et al, Respondents, No. 54715-7. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. […]

Read More

SMITH v. KNEISLEY, 187 Wn. 699 (1936)

60 P.2d 19 JOSEPH B. SMITH, Respondent, v. LYDIA V. KNEISLEY, Appellant, NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Garnishee Defendants. No. 25668. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 13, 1936. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered February 19, 1935, upon findings in favor of the […]

Read More

JOHNSON v. PATE, 54 Wn.2d 148 (1959)

338 P.2d 131 R.E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. W.D. PATE, Defendant and Relator, THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR PIERCE COUNTY, Hardyn Soule, Judge, Respondent.[1] No. 35053.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 23, 1959. [1] Reported in 338 P.2d 131. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — DECISIONS REVIEWABLE — ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. Assuming that a trial […]

Read More

MacPHERSON v. FRANCO, 34 Wn.2d 179 (1949)

208 P.2d 641 WILLIAM MACPHERSON, Appellant, v. MARCO I. FRANCO et al., Respondents.[1] No. 30941.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. July 19, 1949. [1] Reported in 208 P.2d 641. [1] NOVATION — NATURE AND REQUISITES — DISCHARGE OF EXISTING OBLIGATION. A novation is a mutual agreement among all parties concerned for the discharge of […]

Read More

IN RE RINGROSE, 188 Wn. 477 (1936)

62 P.2d 1104 In the Matter of the Application of ROY E. RINGROSE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. No. 26415. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 11, 1936. [1] EXTRADITION (9) — RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF ACCUSED AFTER EXTRADITION — PROSECUTION FOR OFFENSE OTHER THAN THAT CHARGED IN EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS. A fugitive from […]

Read More

OPPORTUNITY TOWNSHIP v. KINGSLAND, 194 Wn. 229 (1938)

77 P.2d 793 OPPORTUNITY TOWNSHIP, Respondent, v. H.L. KINGSLAND, as County Assessor of Spokane County, Appellant. No. 26918. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 31, 1938. [1] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — COUNTIES — DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENTAL POWERS — DELEGATION TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES OR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — TOWNSHIPS — LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT — ASSESSMENT OF TAXES BY […]

Read More

LILLIE v. LOUNDRY, 162 Wn. 703 (1931)

298 P. 1070 C.H. LILLIE, as Administrator, Appellant, v. EMMA LOUNDRY, Respondent. No. 22874. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 7, 1931. Appeal from an order of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered February 14, 1930, approving the final account of the administrator of an estate, after a hearing on the […]

Read More

WILSON v. TIMES PRINTING CO., 158 Wn. 95 (1930)

290 P. 691 WILLIAM WILSON, Respondent, v. TIMES PRINTING COMPANY, Appellant. No. 22513. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 5, 1930. [1] MASTER AND SERVANT (172, 176, 177) — LIABILITIES FOR INJURIES TO THIRD PERSONS — SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT — WHO ARE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS — CONTROL OF EMPLOYER — EMPLOYEE OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The […]

Read More

STATE v. HARRIS, 130 Wn.2d 35 (1996)

921 P.2d 1052 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. THOMAS MATTHEW HARRIS, Petitioner. No. 63346-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued May 30, 1996. Decided August 29, 1996. Page 36 Appeal from the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-8-02990-0, Bobbe J. Bridge, J., on August 30, 1994. Darby N. DuComb of Washington Appellate Project, […]

Read More

STATE v. BALLARD, 158 Wn. 147 (1930)

290 P. 703 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BOB BALLARD (alias Robert Thornton) et al., Appellants. No. 22450. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 11, 1930. [1] INTOXICATING LIQUORS (31, 50) — OFFENSES — JOINTIST — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. A conviction of a jointist is sustained by evidence that accused was about the […]

Read More

PURCHASE v. MEYER, 108 Wn.2d 220 (1987)

737 P.2d 661 DAVID PURCHASE, Petitioner, v. MARY MARGARET MEYER, Petitioner, EL TORITO RESTAURANT AND CANTINA, Respondent. No. 52270-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 28, 1987. [1] Intoxicating Liquors — Torts — Providing Liquor — Obvious Intoxication — Determination. Whether a person is obviously intoxicated so that liability can be predicated on the […]

Read More

STATE v. NIST, 77 Wn.2d 227 (1969)

461 P.2d 322 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROBERT ANTHONY NIST, Appellant.[*] No. 39859.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 13, 1969. [*] Reported in 461 P.2d 322. [1] Criminal Law — Appeal and Error — Review — Harmless Error. Constitutional error in the admission of evidence in a criminal case is harmless […]

Read More

STATE v. LITKE, 157 Wn.2d 1014 (2006)

139 P.3d 350 STATE, Respondent v. LITKE, Petitioner. No. 77994-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 7, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 54783-6-I, October 10, 2005, 129 Wn. App. 1045. Denied.

Read More

MAD RIVER ORCHARD v. KRACK, 89 Wn.2d 535 (1978)

573 P.2d 796 MAD RIVER ORCHARD COMPANY, ET AL, Appellants, v. KRACK CORPORATION, ET AL, Respondents. No. 44870.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 19, 1978. [1] Evidence — Offer of Proof — Purpose — Sufficiency. The purpose of an offer of proof is to inform the court of the legal theory under which […]

Read More

LABOR INDUS. v. COMMON CARRIERS, 111 Wn.2d 586 (1988)

762 P.2d 348 THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Petitioner, v. COMMON CARRIERS, INC., Respondent. No. 55102-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 20, 1988. [1] Statutes — Construction — Federal Statutes — Preemption of State Law — Test. Federal preemption of state law depends on congressional intent and will not be found unless […]

Read More

STATE v. AMINEV, 165 Wn.2d 1042 (2009)

State, Respondent, v. Aminev, Petitioner. No. 82291-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 1, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 60006-1-I, August 11, 2008, 146 Wn. App. 1029. Denied.

Read More

MERAGER v. TURNBULL, 2 Wn.2d 711 (1940)

99 P.2d 434 O.G. MERAGER, Respondent, v. ALEX TURNBULL et al., Appellants.[1] No. 27765.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. February 21, 1940. [1] Reported in 99 P.2d 434. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — REVIEW — HARMLESS ERROR — ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE — EQUITABLE ACTIONS. In an equitable action, triable de novo on appeal, evidence […]

Read More

DAVIDSON v. STATE, 116 Wn.2d 13 (1991)

802 P.2d 1374 CLIFFORD W. DAVIDSON, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents. No. 55965-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 10, 1991. [1] State — Deeds — Construction — In Favor of State. When a deed or grant from the State fails to define or limit the boundary of […]

Read More

SEATTLE v. WR PARTNERS II LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 129 Wn.2d 1031 (1996)

922 P.2d 97 Seattle, Respondent, v. WR Partners II Ltd. Partnership, Respondent, Samuel’s Credit Jewelers, Inc., Petitioner. No. 64006-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 4, 1996. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 26, 1996, 80 Wn. App. 1059. Denied September 4, 1996.

Read More

CONNOR v. ROBINSON, 137 Wn. 672 (1926)

243 P. 849, 246 P. 758 E.O. CONNOR, as Receiver etc., Respondent, v. WALTER J. ROBINSON et al., Appellants. No. 19524. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 4, 1926. [1] CORPORATIONS (42) — SUBSCRIPTIONS TO STOCK — PAYMENT IN PROPERTY — VALIDITY. Creditors of a corporation, capitalized at $1,500,000, whose principal asset was patent […]

Read More

STATE v. RUSSELL, 125 Wn.2d 24 (1994)

882 P.2d 747 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. GEORGE W. RUSSELL, Appellant. No. 60673-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 13, 1994. [1] Evidence — Opinion Evidence — Expert Testimony — Scientific Acceptance — Necessity — In General. Novel scientific evidence is admissible only if the theory on which the evidence is based […]

Read More

WITZEL v. TENA, 48 Wn.2d 628 (1956)

295 P.2d 1115 FRANCES WITZEL, Appellant, v. TELL TENA, Respondent.[1] No. 33513.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 12, 1956. [1] Reported in 295 P.2d 1115. [1] COURTS — JURISDICTION — SUPERIOR COURTS. The superior courts of this state are courts of general jurisdiction and have power to hear all cases in equity and […]

Read More

SCUDDER v. SCUDDER, 55 Wn.2d 454 (1960)

348 P.2d 225 JANET GRIFFIN SCUDDER, Respondent v. KATHRYN HACKETT SCUDDER, as Executrix, Appellant.[1] No. 34899.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 14, 1960. [1] Reported in 348 P.2d 225. [1] DIVORCE — SUPPORT OF CHILDREN — MODIFICATION OF DECREE. A husband’s obligations to make support payments for the benefit of minor children which […]

Read More

AMENDE v. BREMERTON, 36 Wn.2d 333 (1950)

217 P.2d 1049 RALPH AMENDE, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF BREMERTON et al., Respondents.[1] No. 31293.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 8, 1950. [1] Reported in 217 P.2d 1049. [1] MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — CLAIMS — WRONGFUL DIVERSION OF FUNDS. Actions seeking recovery of funds alleged to have been wrongfully diverted from special assessment […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 110 Wn.2d 1006 (1988)

The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Walters, Petitioner, No. 54638-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 19143-8-I, July 28, 1987. Denied February 1, 1988. Steinmetz, Respondent, v. Hall-Conway-Jackson, Inc., et al, Petitioners, No. 54538-3. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, August 31, […]

Read More

BARNES v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DIST., 88 Wn.2d 483 (1977)

563 P.2d 199 ROBERT L. BARNES, ET AL, Respondents, v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL, Appellants. No. 44081.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 28, 1977. [1] Schools and School Districts — Teachers — Discharge — Sufficient Cause — Economic Reasons. The adverse financial condition of a school district does not constitute […]

Read More

IN RE BUCKINGHAM v. CRANOR, 45 Wn.2d 116 (1954)

273 P.2d 494 In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of W.H. BUCKINGHAM, Petitioner, v. JOHN R. CRANOR, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1] No. 32669.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 5, 1954. [1] Reported in 273 P.2d 494. [1] HABEAS CORPUS — PROCEEDINGS REVIEWABLE — FINAL […]

Read More

IN RE PERS, 158 Wn.2d 1002 (2006)

In re Pers. Restraint of Bowman, Petitioner. In re Pers. Restraint of Nav, Petitioner. No. 78739-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 10, 2006. Motion for discretionary review of decisions of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 53250-2-I and 55488-3-I, April 3, 2006, 132 Wn. App. 1017. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary […]

Read More

PAULSON v. CUDDY, 31 Wn.2d 924 (1948)

199 P.2d 920 E.E. PAULSON et al., Respondents, v. FLORENCE E. CUDDY, Appellant.[1] No. 30643.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. November 30, 1948. [1] Reported in 199 P.2d 920. [1] SALES — RESCISSION BY BUYER — FRAUD IN INDUCING SALE OF HOTEL PROPERTY — MISREPRESENTATIONS AS TO LEGAL RENTALS — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In […]

Read More

CAMPBELL v. REED, 160 Wn.2d 1023 (2007)

163 P.3d 794 Campbell, Petitioner, v. Reed et al., Respondents. No. 79344-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 11, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 33395-3-II, August 1, 2006, 134 Wn. App. 349. Denied. Page 1024

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[†] , 133 Wn.2d 1007 (1997)

The Supreme Court of Washington. 1997. [†] Dispositions of Court of Appeals Commissioner rulings are identified by case names not in italic. Williams, et al., Petitioners, v. Government Employees Ins. Co., Respondent. No. 65433-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, April 18, 1997, 85 Wn. App. 1074. Denied September 3, […]

Read More

AMSBURY v. COWLES PUBLISHING CO., 76 Wn.2d 733 (1969)

458 P.2d 882 DOUGLAS G. AMSBURY et al., Appellants, v. THE COWLES PUBLISHING COMPANY, Respondent.[*] No. 39119.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 18, 1969. [*] Reported in 458 P.2d 882. [1] Civil Procedure — Withdrawal of Issue — How Presented. A motion to withdraw an issue is a proper procedural method to seek […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. EASTVOLD v. SUP’R CT., 44 Wn.2d 607 (1954)

269 P.2d 560 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Don Eastvold, as Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR SKAGIT COUNTY et al., Respondents.[1] No. 32814.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 22, 1954. [1] Reported in 269 P.2d 560. [1] EMINENT DOMAIN — HIGHWAYS — POWER OF STATE — CONDEMNATION […]

Read More

IN RE MOONEY v. CRANOR, 38 Wn.2d 881 (1951)

233 P.2d 850 In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of LEWIS B. MOONEY, Petitioner, v. JOHN R. CRANOR, As Warden of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1] No. 31760.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. July 12, 1951. [1] Reported in 233 P.2d 850. [1] HABEAS CORPUS — PROCEEDINGS — SCOPE […]

Read More

IN RE ESTATE OF LYONS, 83 Wn.2d 105 (1973)

515 P.2d 1293 In the Matter of the Estate of SAMUEL C. LYONS, Deceased. CLARENCE E. LYONS, as Executor, Appellant, v. BERNICE H. SORENSON, as Guardian, Respondent. No. 42689.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 21, 1973. [1] Statutes — Repeal — By Implication. While repeal of a statute by implication is not favored […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 139 Wn.2d 1010 (1999)

The Supreme Court of Washington. 1999. State, Respondent, v. Morton, Petitioner, No. 68249-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, June 18, 1999, 96 Wn. App. 1005. Denied December 1, 1999. State, Respondent, v. Parra, Defendant, Kent, Petitioner, No. 68250-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, […]

Read More

AGRI. LIVESTOCK CREDIT CORP. v. McKENZIE, 157 Wn. 597 (1930)

289 P. 527 AGRICULTURAL LIVESTOCK CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. PERRY H. McKENZIE et al., Defendants, PORTLAND LIVESTOCK COMPANY, Appellant, AUGUSTA KALANQUIN, Respondent. AUGUSTA KALANQUIN, Respondent, v. PERRY H. McKENZIE, et al., Defendants, PORTLAND LIVESTOCK COMPANY, Appellant. No. 21991. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 8, 1930. [1] JUDGMENT (41) — VACATING DEFAULT — EXCUSABLE […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 94 Wn.2d 1023 (1980)

The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Farrugia, Petitioner, No. 47323. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, July 14, 1980, 26 Wn. App. 1035. Denied November 7, 1980. Wells, Petitioner, v. Kitsap County, Respondent, No. 47332. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, July 21, […]

Read More

REYNOLDS v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO., 176 Wn. 36 (1934)

28 P.2d 310 OSCAR F. REYNOLDS, as Administrator, et al., Respondents, v. THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 24561. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 3, 1934. [1] INSURANCE (103, 130) — FORFEITURE OF POLICY — NONPAYMENT — EXCUSES — NOTICE AND PROOF. Proof of permanent total disability must be supplied prior to the […]

Read More

STATE v. LEE, 128 Wn.2d 151 (1995)

904 P.2d 1143 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. EARL LEE, Petitioner. No. 62725-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 9, 1995. Page 152 Hugh M. Spall, Jr., for petitioner. Jeffrey C. Sullivan, Prosecuting Attorney, and Bruce Hanify and Michael G. McCarthy, Deputies, for respondent. Page 153 MADSEN, J. The Defendant seeks review of […]

Read More

PEHRSON v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 334, 194 Wn. 334 (1938)

77 P.2d 1022 G.A. PEHRSON, Respondent, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 334, Appellant. No. 26917. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 7, 1938. [1] SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS — CONTRACTS — CAPACITY TO CONTRACT — OFFICERS AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS. Under Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 4702, 4776, and 4817, a school district’s authority to […]

Read More

WALLACE v. EVANS, 131 Wn.2d 572 (1997)

934 P.2d 662 MICHAEL H. WALLACE, ET AL., Respondents, v. ANDREW L. EVANS, ET AL., Petitioners. No. 63740-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued November 20, 1996. Decided April 10, 1997. Page 573 TALMADGE and JOHNSON, JJ., dissent by separate opinion. Appeal from the Superior Court for King County, No. 87-2-14016-4, R. Joseph Wesley, J., […]

Read More

ADOLFSON v. STATE FARM FIRE CAS., 163 Wn.2d 1026 (2008)

Adolfson, Petitioner, v. State Farm Fire Cas. Ins. Co., Respondent. No. 80585-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 30, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 58292-5-I, July 30, 2007, 139 Wn. App. 1083. Denied. Page 1027

Read More

STATE v. WEBER, 163 Wn.2d 1001 (2008)

180 P.3d 783 State, Respondent, v. Weber, Petitioner. No. 80129-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 4, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 24038-0-III, April 10, 2007, 137 Wn. App. 852. Denied.

Read More

MARKALL v. SMITHWAY MCHY. CO., 34 Wn.2d 749 (1949)

209 P.2d 449 MAURICE MARKALL, Appellant, v. SMITHWAY MACHINERY COMPANY et al., Respondents.[1] No. 30945.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. September 3, 1949. [1] Reported in 209 P.2d 449. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — BRIEFS — REPLY BRIEFS. Under Rule of Supreme Court 11, an appellant is not permitted to urge in his reply […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 83 Wn.2d 1010 (1973)

The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Petitioner, v. Lesnick, Respondent, No. 43141. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, December 28, 1973, 10 Wn. App. 281. Granted March 18, 1974. State, Respondent, v. Collins, Petitioner, No. 43138. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, December 12, 1973, […]

Read More

FINOS v. NETHERLANDS AMERICAN MTG. BANK, 147 Wn. 86 (1928)

265 P. 167 VIRGIL FINOS, Respondent, v. NETHERLANDS AMERICAN MORTGAGE BANK et al., Defendants, E.M. CASHMAN et al., Appellants, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent and Appellant. No. 20895. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 14, 1928. [1] MINES AND MINERALS (21) — LIENS — ENFORCEMENT. One filing a claim of lien upon mining property […]

Read More

SUNNY BROOK FARMS v. OMDAHL, 42 Wn.2d 788 (1953)

259 P.2d 383 SUNNY BROOK FARMS, Respondent and Cross-appellant, v. SVERRE N. OMDAHL, as State Director of Agriculture, Appellant.[1] No. 32230.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. July 1, 1953. [1] Reported in 259 P.2d 383. [1] ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCEDURE — JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS — AVAILABILITY OF OTHER REMEDY. When an administrative […]

Read More

STAFFORD v. STAFFORD, 10 Wn.2d 649 (1941)

117 P.2d 753 MORGAN A. STAFFORD et al., Appellants, v. EVELYN STAFFORD, Respondent.[1] No. 28515.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. October 10, 1941. [1] Reported in 117 P.2d 753. [1] HUSBAND AND WIFE — COMMUNITY PROPERTY — SEPARATE DEBTS. A separate judgment against a husband does not become a lien against community property. [2] […]

Read More

BARFKNECHT v. SHEPARD STEAMSHIP CO., 1 Wn.2d 643 (1939)

99 P.2d 387 ARTHUR BARFKNECHT, Appellant, v. SHEPARD STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Respondent.[1] No. 27698.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. December 8, 1939. [1] Reported in 99 P.2d 387. [1] SEAMEN — WAGES — FORFEITURE — ABSENCE FROM VESSEL. A seaman who absents himself without leave and does not return to the ship by sailing time, […]

Read More

STATE v. GOEBEL, 36 Wn.2d 367 (1950)

218 P.2d 300 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. LEE RAYMOND GOEBEL, Appellant.[1] No. 31079.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 13, 1950. [1] Reported in 218 P.2d 300. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — EVIDENCE — OTHER OFFENSES — ADMISSIBILITY — EXCEPTIONS. A defendant must be tried for the offenses charged in the indictment or […]

Read More

STATE v. ARINE, 182 Wn. 697 (1935)

48 P.2d 249 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DAVID ARINE, Appellant. No. 25493. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 12, 1935. [1] CRIMINAL LAW (117) — EVIDENCE — CHARACTER OF ACCUSED — WEIGHT AND EFFECT OF EVIDENCE — QUALIFICATION OF WITNESS. Negative testimony as to the good character of accused should be stricken […]

Read More

STATE v. KING, 130 Wn.2d 517 (1996)

925 P.2d 606 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. EDWARD LEE KING, Petitioner. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of EDWARD LEE KING, Petitioner. No. 63247-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued March 27, 1996. Decided October 24, 1996. Page 518 ALEXANDER and SANDERS, JJ., dissent by separate opinions. Page 519 Appeal from the […]

Read More

COLWELL v. EISING, 118 Wn.2d 861 (1992)

827 P.2d 1005 ROBERT B. COLWELL, ET AL, Appellants, v. PETER W. EISING, ET AL, Respondents. No. 57924-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 23, 1992. [1] Limitation of Actions — Partnership — Action Between Partners — Accrual of Cause — Delay Until Dissolution — Limitation — “Partner’s Interest”. RCW 25.04.430, under which a […]

Read More

STATE v. CREWS, 131 Wn.2d 1014 (1997)

State, Respondent, v. Crews, Petitioner. No. 64920-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 5, 1997. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 19345-1-II, September 25, 1996. Denied March 5, 1997.

Read More

SHERMAN v. MOLONEY, 106 Wn.2d 873 (1986)

725 P.2d 966 GRANT A. SHERMAN, Respondent, v. NEIL MOLONEY, as Chief of the Washington State Patrol, ET AL, Appellants. No. 52595-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 2, 1986. [1] Public Employment — State Patrol — Discipline — Judicial Review — Standard of Review. Under RCW 43.43.100, Page 874 which provides for judicial […]

Read More

STATE v. KAMPS, 150 Wn.2d 1027 (2004)

State, Respondent, v. Kamps, Petitioner. No. 74161-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 7, 2004. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 20024-8-III, May 13, 2003, 116 Wn. App. 1073. Denied.

Read More

REEVE v. ARNOLDO, 176 Wn. 679 (1934)

30 P.2d 943 J.A. REEVE, Respondent, v. MARIE LOUISE ARNOLDO et al., Appellants. No. 24783. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 21, 1934. [1] JUDGMENT (54) — NOTWITHSTANDING VERDICT. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict involves no question of discretion and can be granted only when there is no evidence, or reasonable inference […]

Read More

WARREN v. HART, 71 Wn.2d 512 (1967)

429 P.2d 873 VIOLA WARREN, Appellant, v. ARTHUR H. HART et al., Respondents.[*] No. 37817.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. June 29, 1967. [*] Reported in 429 P.2d 873. [1] Evidence — Traffic Citation — Admissibility. Testimony concerning whether a traffic citation was issued to either party involved in an automobile accident is inadmissible […]

Read More

JANOVICH v. HERRON, 91 Wn.2d 767 (1979)

592 P.2d 1096 GEORGE V. JANOVICH, Appellant, v. DON HERRON, ET AL, Respondents. No. 45991.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 30, 1979. [1] Statutes — Construction — Legislative Intent — In General. The primary objective in interpreting a statute is to give effect to the intent of the legislature. [2] Officers — Recall […]

Read More

STATE v. SWAN, 25 Wn.2d 319 (1946)

171 P.2d 222 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ORVAL SWAN, Appellant.[1] No. 29814.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. July 8, 1946. [1] Reported in 171 P.2d 222. [1] HOMICIDE — MANSLAUGHTER — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In a prosecution for manslaughter, held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. [2] […]

Read More

REVIEW ORDERS, 147 Wn.2d 1005 (2002)

The Supreme Court of Washington. 2002 State, Respondent, v. Carlstrom, Petitioner, No. 72333-8. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, February 11, 2002, 110 Wn. App. 1027. Denied September 4, 2002. Horan, et al., Respondents, v. City of Federal Way, Petitioner, No. 72334-6. Petition for review of a decision of the […]

Read More

STATE v. BUCHANAN, 160 Wn.2d 1009 (2007)

158 P.3d 615 State, Respondent, v. Buchanan, Petitioner. No. 79192-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 2, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 34264-2-II, August 15, 2006. Denied.

Read More

FOSS v. THE PACIFIC TEL. TEL. CO., 26 Wn.2d 92 (1946)

173 P.2d 144 AAGE FOSS, Appellant, v. THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Respondent.[1] No. 29971.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. October 1, 1946. [1] Reported in 173 P.2d 144. [1] DAMAGES — MEASURE OF DAMAGES — BREACH OF CONTRACT. The measure of damages for breach of contract is such damages as may fairly and […]

Read More

YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL CO. v. WALKER, 76 Wn.2d 90 (1969)

455 P.2d 372 YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL COMPANY, Appellant, v. WILLIAM WALKER et al., Respondents.[*] No. 39492.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. May 29, 1969. [*] Reported in 455 P.2d 372. [1] Adverse Possession — Extent of Claim — Color of Title — Possession of Part of Land Described. When a claim to an interest […]

Read More

GAMMON v. CLARK EQUIPMENT, 104 Wn.2d 613 (1985)

707 P.2d 685 JUDY L. GAMMON, Individually and as Personal Representative, ET AL, Respondents, v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO., Petitioner. No. 51041-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 17, 1985. [1] Trial — Instructions — Number — Specificity. The number and degree of specificity of instructions is a determination within the trial court’s discretion. [2] […]

Read More

SIEWERT v. STATE, 164 Wn.2d 1017 (2008)

Siewert, Petitioner, v. State et al., Respondents. No. 81358-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 4, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 60291-8-I, January 7, 2008, 142 Wn. App. 1021. Review Orders. Denied.

Read More

BINO v. VEENHUIZEN, 141 Wn. 18 (1926)

250 P. 450 LOUIS BINO, by his Guardian ad litem Laura Bino, Respondent, v. H. VEENHUIZEN et al., Appellants. No. 20012. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 9, 1926. [1] TRIAL (126) — VERDICT — FORM — CORRECTION BY JURY. The trial court may, under Rem. Comp. Stat., § 360, send the jury back […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 148 Wn.2d 1006 (2003)

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW AND SELECTED MOTIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW The Supreme Court of Washington. 2003 Brisbon, et al., Respondents, v. Brem-Air Disposal, Inc., Petitioner, No. 72772-4. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 26849-3-II, May 24, 2002, 111 Wn. App. 1052. Denied January 8, 2003. Schaeffer, Petitioner, v. […]

Read More

MICKELSON v. WILLIAMS, 54 Wn.2d 293 (1959)

340 P.2d 770 EDWIN MICKELSON et al., Appellants, v. WINNIFRED M. WILLIAMS et al., Respondents.[1] No. 34742.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. June 11, 1959. [1] Reported in 340 P.2d 770. [1] ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL — DEATH OF PARTY — CAUSES WHICH SURVIVE. The common law relative to survival of actions prevails in this […]

Read More

WAPPLER v. PACIFIC DOOR MFG. CO., 185 Wn. 241 (1936)

53 P.2d 738 FRED WAPPLER, Respondent, v. PACIFIC DOOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant, FRED O. LARSON et al., Appellants. No. 25609. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 20, 1936. [1] AUTOMOBILES — LIABILITY FOR INJURIES — CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE — RIGHTS OF PEDESTRIANS AT CROSSINGS — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. A finding that a pedestrian, struck by […]

Read More

HAY v. HAY, 38 Wn.2d 513 (1951)

230 P.2d 791 RAYMOND M. HAY et al., Respondents, v. EDWARD T. HAY, Individually and as Administrator, Appellant.[1] No. 31476.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 1, 1951. [1] Reported in 230 P.2d 791. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — REQUISITES AND PROCEEDINGS — NOTICE OF APPEAL — PARTIES ENTITLED TO NOTICE — UNNECESSARY PARTIES. […]

Read More

IN RE POLI’S ESTATE, 27 Wn.2d 670 (1947)

179 P.2d 704 In the Matter of the Estate of ESTHERINA POLI, Deceased. BERNARD POLI, Appellant, v. DANTE POLI, Respondent.[1] No. 30121.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 17, 1947. [1] Reported in 179 P.2d 704. [1] EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS — ALLOWANCES TO SURVIVING SPOUSE — PROPERTY IN LIEU OF HOMESTEAD — CONDITIONS PRECEDENT […]

Read More

STATE v. WADE, 138 Wn.2d 460 (1999)

979 P.2d 850 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. CHARLES FIDEL WADE, Respondent. No. 67459-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Considered May 5, 1999. Decided July 8, 1999. Page 461 John William Ladenburg, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathleen Practor, Deputy, for petitioner. Patricia Anne Pethick, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The State seeks review of a Court […]

Read More

STATE v. MECCA TWIN THEATER, 82 Wn.2d 87 (1973)

507 P.2d 1165 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MECCA TWIN THEATER AND FILM EXCHANGE, INC., et al., Appellants. No. 42475.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 22, 1973. [1] Appeal and Error — Jurisdiction — Notice of Appeal — Effect. The filing of a notice of appeal from a trial court’s nonappealable order […]

Read More

DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 108 Wn.2d 1003 (1987)

The Supreme Court of Washington. Liedtke, et al, Petitioners, v. Thornborrow, et al, Respondents, No. 53582-5. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, January 14, 1987, 46 Wn. App. 1033 Denied March 31, 1987. State, Petitioner, v. Hanson, Respondent, No. 53622-8. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of […]

Read More

SEATTLE TRUST CO. v. STEPHENS, 183 Wn. 687 (1935)

49 P.2d 463 SEATTLE TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. G.M. STEPHENS et al., Respondents. No. 25419. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 30, 1935. [1] EXECUTION (67) — HOMESTEAD (29-1) — MORTGAGES (221) — POSSESSION DURING PERIOD OF REDEMPTION — ABANDONMENT OF HOMESTEAD. Under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 602, the purchaser at an execution sale […]

Read More

IN RE PERS. RESTRAINT OF PULLMAN, 167 Wn.2d 205 (2009)

218 P.3d 913 In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of JAY ROBERT PULLMAN, JR., Petitioner. No. 80834-1.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued October 30, 2008. Decided October 8, 2009. Page 206 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 207 [EDITORS’ NOTE: […]

Read More

WEST SIDE TELEPHONE CO. v. KENISON, 147 Wn. 542 (1928)

266 P. 706 WEST SIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. RALPH B. KENISON et al., Respondents. No. 20883. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 14, 1928. [1] APPEAL (370) — REVIEW — THEORY OF CASE IN LOWER COURT. A case tried and determined upon the theory of fraud, collusion and conspiracy in a […]

Read More

NORTHWEST METAL PROD. v. DEPT. LABOR IND., 12 Wn.2d 155 (1942)

120 P.2d 855 NORTHWEST METAL PRODUCTS, INC., Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES et al., Appellants.[1] No. 28499.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 6, 1942. [1] Reported in 120 P.2d 855. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — PROCEEDINGS — REVIEW BY COURT — PRESUMPTIONS AND BURDEN OF PROOF. In all court proceedings under […]

Read More

STATE v. LAMBERT, 148 Wn. 657 (1928)

269 P. 848 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CARL LAMBERT, Appellant. No. 21085. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 29, 1928. [1] CRIMINAL LAW (123) — INTOXICATING LIQUORS (51) — INSTRUCTIONS — EVIDENCE WRONGFULLY OBTAINED. In a liquor prosecution, obtained by the testimony of arresting officers, it is proper to refuse an instruction […]

Read More