Category: Washington Supreme Court Opinions

733 P.2d 182 VALLEY VIEW INDUSTRIAL PARK, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF REDMOND, Appellant. No. 50990-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 12, 1987. [1] Appeal — Assignments of Error — Argument — Necessity — In General. Assignments of error which are not supported by argument in a brief are deemed abandoned. [2] Zoning […]

165 P.2d 853 C.R. DICK, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.[1] No. 29745.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 1, 1946. [1] Reported in 165 P.2d 853. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — PROCEEDINGS TO SECURE — REVIEW — INSTRUCTIONS — PRESUMPTIONS — DECISION BASED UPON TESTIMONY BEFORE EXAMINER. In industrial insurance proceedings, […]

300 P.2d 577 THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE et al., Respondents.[1] No. 33542.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 2, 1956. [1] Reported in 300 P.2d 577. [1] BRIDGES — MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — POWER TO CONTROL AND REGULATE — STATE BRIDGES IN CITY — CONTROL BY CITY — […]

834 P.2d 17 KEVIN CONARD, ET AL, Petitioners, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents. No. 58719-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 6, 1992. [1] Constitutional Law — Construction — State and Federal Provisions — Independent State Interpretation — Argument — Necessity. When a constitutional challenge is made under both a federal […]

321 P.2d 275 HOWARD P. BRAMAN et al., Respondents, v. JOHN KUPER et al., Appellants.[1] No. 34125.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. February 7, 1958. [1] Reported in 321 P.2d 275. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — NOTICE OF APPEAL — WHO MUST BE SERVED. Notice of appeal is required to be served only upon […]

137 P.2d 109 EDWARD KALNOSKI, Respondent, v. CARLISLE LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appellants.[1] No. 28941.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 1, 1943. [1] Reported in 137 P.2d 109. [1] DEEDS — LOGS AND LOGGING — RIGHT TO CUT AND REMOVE TIMBER — REASONABLE TIME. Where a deed to standing timber does not fix […]

499 P.2d 869 AMERICAN DISCOUNT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. SARATOGA WEST, INC., et al., Defendants, MISSION RIDGE ESTATES, Appellant. No. 42206.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. July 20, 1972. [1] Civil Procedure — Parties — Intervention — Examination of Pleadings. The court will examine the pleadings and accept the well pleaded allegations as true when […]

24 P.2d 418 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of J. CLYDE RIDENOUR, Plaintiff, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, Respondent. ESTHER RIDENOUR, Respondent, v. J. CLYDE RIDENOUR, Appellant. Nos. 24411, 24562. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 15, 1933. [1] DIVORCE (86) — ALIMONY — ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER — CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS […]

145 P.2d 286 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON on the Relation of S.F. Price, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE et al., Respondents.[1] No. 29184.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. January 28, 1944. [1] Reported in 145 P.2d 286. [1] MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — OFFICERS AND AGENTS — REMOVAL — RESTRICTION OF CIVIL SERVICE RULES — […]

242 P.2d 1048 HILDA JANE STARKEY, Appellant, v. FRANK D. STARKEY, Respondent and Cross-appellant.[1] No. 31906.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 10, 1952. [1] Reported in 242 P.2d 1048. [1] DIVORCE — CONTEMPT — CUSTODY OF CHILDREN — CONTEMPT NOT EXONERATED BY PRIOR CONTEMPT OF OTHER PARTY. The acts of a former wife […]

351 P.2d 919 In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of TOMMY WHITE, Petitioner, v. MERLE E. SCHNECKLOTH, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1] No. 34128.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 5, 1960. [1] Reported in 351 P.2d 919. [1] INDIANS — CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS — JURISDICTION. Assault […]

282 P.2d 291 ROY SIMMS, Appellant, v. BOB ERVIN et al., Respondents.[1] No. 32991.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 7, 1955. [1] Reported in 282 P.2d 291. [1] SALES — RESCISSION OF CONTRACT BY PURCHASER — FRAUD — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In an action for the rescission of a contract for the sale […]

166 P.3d 719 State, Respondent, v. Preston, Petitioner. No. 79362-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 5, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 23579-3-III, September 14, 2006, 134 Wn. App. 1064. Denied. Page 1004

175 P.3d 1094 In re Marriage of Hallaq. No. 79817-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 5, 2007. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 24097-5-III, January 9, 2007. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary Review. Denied.

37 P.2d 1115 W.C. JACOBS et al., Respondents, v. LAURA LAWSON, Defendant, GEORGE HOOPS, Appellant. No. 25233. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 23, 1934. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Findley, J., entered February 3, 1934, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in supplemental proceedings, after a […]

94 P.2d 488 In the Matter of the Estate of PAUL NOGLEBERG, Deceased. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, by Robt. F. Waldron, as Supervisor of the State Inheritance Tax and Escheat Division, Appellant, v. O.S. HAUGEN, as Executor, Respondent. No. 27131. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 11, 1939. [1] TAXATION — INHERITANCE TAXES — […]

225 P.2d 206 BETTY J. PAULSON, Appellant, v. DOUGLAS PAULSON, Respondent.[1] No. 31494.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. December 7, 1950. [1] Reported in 225 P.2d 206. [1] EVIDENCE — WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY — PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE. Where there are only two witnesses, one of whom asserts and the other denies, a trial judge, […]

397 P.2d 830 BERNARD W. CHRISTENSEN et al., Respondents, v. J.M. HOSKINS et al., Appellants.[*] No. 37326.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. December 24, 1964. [*] Reported in 397 P.2d 830. [1] Vendor and Purchaser — Contracts — Warranties — Construction Contracts. A builder’s warranty that a house was constructed in substantial compliance with […]

10 P.2d 999 FRED HEBISH et al., Respondents, v. PACIFIC COUNTY et al., Appellants. No. 23627. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 2, 1932. [1] HIGHWAYS (3, 9) — ESTABLISHMENT BY PRESCRIPTION — MODE AND EXTENT OF USE — EXISTENCE OF HIGHWAY — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. The evidence sustains findings that no public road […]

245 P.3d 227 State, Respondent, v. Merino, Petitioner. No. 84884-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 3, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 37507-9-II, April 27, 2010, 155 Wn. App. 1039. Denied.

9 P.2d 1107 LOLA MAY EVERETT, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent. No. 23608. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 12, 1932. [1] MASTER AND SERVANT (20-1) — WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — EXTRAHAZARDOUS OCCUPATION — OPERATION OF WATERWORKS. A manager in sole charge of the operation of a waterworks plant was engaged […]

262 P.3d 64 In re Dependency of J.M.R. No. 86048-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 27, 2011. Motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 64711-3-I, April 4, 2011, 160 Wn. App. 929. Granted on a specific issue.

406 P.2d 599 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JEFFERY CRAIG, Defendant, KENNETH L. KONTRATH, Appellant.[*] No. 37698.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. October 7, 1965. [*] Reported in 406 P.2d 599. [1] Criminal Law — Evidence — Motion to Suppress. A simple objection at the time physical evidence is offered at trial is […]

274 P.2d 574 ROYAL N. RIBLET et al., Appellants, v. SPOKANE-PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, Respondent.[1] No. 32824.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. October 1, 1954. [1] Reported in 274 P.2d 574. [1] EVIDENCE — WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY — UNCONTRADICTED EVIDENCE. In a case tried to the court, it is within the province of the trial […]

717 P.2d 722 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. PATRICK JAMES JEFFRIES, Appellant. No. 50062-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 27, 1986. [1] Criminal Law — Trial — Taking Case From Jury — Sufficiency of Evidence — In General. Evidence is sufficient to uphold a criminal conviction if, viewing the evidence and the […]

259 P.3d 1108 Lockhart, Petitioner v. Robinson et al., Respondents. The Supreme Court of Washington. No. 86013-1. September 6, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 40214-9-II, April 12, 2011, 161 Wn. App. 1006. Denied.

318 P.2d 959 MONDO DESIMONE et al., Appellants, v. FLOSSIE SPENCE, Respondent.[1] No. 34213.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. December 12, 1957. [1] Reported in 318 P.2d 959. [1] EQUITY — PRINCIPLES AND MAXIMS. Equity regards that as done which ought to have been done. [2] ABANDONMENT — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In an action […]

90 P.2d 226 MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF TACOMA et al., Respondents. No. 27335. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 9, 1939. [1] PARTNERSHIP — MUTUAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS — CONFLICT OF PARTNERSHIP AND INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS — GOOD FAITH. The relationship of partners is fiduciary in character and imposes […]

214 P.2d 690 B.J. WITENBERG, Respondent, v. C.E. SYLVIA, Appellant, HAROLD A. DAHL, Defendant.[1] No. 31236.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. February 6, 1950. [1] Reported in 214 P.2d 690. [1] EVIDENCE — PAROL EVIDENCE TO VARY WRITINGS — EFFECT AS TO PERSONS NOT PARTIES. Where a defendant, not a party to agreements between […]

317 P.2d 1064 VERNE E. ALUMBAUGH, Respondent, v. UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD’S, LONDON, Appellant.[1] No. 34274.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 21, 1957. [1] Reported in 317 P.2d 1064. [1] EVIDENCE — SIMILAR FACTS AND TRANSACTIONS — DISCRETION OF COURT. The admission of evidence covered by the rule of substantial similarity rests within […]

998 P.2d 305 M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. TIMBERLINE SOFTWARE CORPORPORATION, ET AL., Respondents. No. 67796-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued October 26, 1999. Decided May 4, 2000. Page 569 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 570 Oles […]

46 P.2d 1052 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Harvey Scofield et al., Appellant, v. FORREST R. EASTERDAY, as Engineer for Pierce County, Respondent. No. 25744. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 13, 1935. [1] STATUTES (14) — SUBJECTS AND TITLES OF ACTS — EXPRESSION IN TITLE OF SUBJECT. Rem. 1935 Sup., […]

224 P.3d 773 Spokane Airport, Respondent, v. RMA, Inc., Petitioner. No. 83396-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. Denied January 5, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 26538-2-III, April 28, 2009, 149 Wn. App. 930. Review Order. Denied

132 P.2d 727 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. LILLY STUMP et al., Appellants.[1] No. 28806.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. January 7, 1943. [1] Reported in 132 P.2d 727. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — TRIAL — SEPARATE TRIALS OF CODEFENDANTS — DISCRETION. In a prosecution of codefendants for violation of the state liquor law, […]

285 P.2d 1048 CHARLES MCKOWN et al., Respondents, v. FLOYD DAVIS et al., Appellants.[1] No. 33041.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. July 21, 1955. [1] Reported in 285 P.2d 1048. [1] SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE — SUFFICIENCY OF PERFORMANCE BY PURCHASER. In an action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of a […]

142 P.3d 607 CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA N.A., Respondent, v. BENNETT, Petitioner. No. 78169-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 6, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 32598-5-II, November 29, 2005. Denied.

61 P.2d 1294 AL GORD, Respondent, v. F.S. HARMON COMPANY, Appellant. No. 26099. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 29, 1936. [1] ARBITRATION AND AWARD (1) — TRADE UNIONS (1) — AGREEMENTS TO ARBITRATE — LABOR DISPUTES — COMMON LAW APPRAISEMENT — VALIDITY. In addition to statutory arbitration, there exists in this state the […]

360 P.2d 561 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WARREN W. SCHOEL, Appellant.[*] No. 35588.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. March 30, 1961. [*] Reported in 360 P.2d 561. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — APPEAL AND ERROR — DISPOSITION OF CAUSE — ORDERING NEW TRIAL — LAW OF THE CASE. In a prosecution for murder […]

278 P.2d 302 PUGET SOUND PAINTERS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., Respondents.[1] No. 32870.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. December 30, 1954. [1] Reported in 278 P.2d 302. [1] BRIDGES — MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR — CONTRACTOR’S BID BOND — BAD FAITH — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In an action […]

210 P.3d 1020 State, Respondent, v. Tu Minh Vo, Petitioner. No. 82805-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 8, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 60604-2-I, January 27, 2009. Denied.

26 P.2d 622 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of George W. Draham, Plaintiff, v. CLIFF YELLE, as State Auditor, Respondent. No. 24784. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 3, 1933. [1] STATES (26) — FISCAL MANAGEMENT — RELIEF LEGISLATION — APPROPRIATIONS — CONSTRUCTION. Chapter 8, Laws of 1933, p. 103 (Rem. 1933 […]

765 P.2d 1300 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. SAMUEL DAVID DUNCAN, Appellant. No. 55362-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 12, 1989. [1] Criminal Law — Review — Trial Court Jurisdiction During Review — Compliance With Criminal Rules — Necessity. In order for a trial court to modify a final ruling which has […]

876 P.2d 448 PATRICK BIGGS, Appellant, v. DAVID B. VAIL, Respondent. No. 59938-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. July 7, 1994. [1] Pleading — Supporting Facts — Reasonable Inquiry — Breach of Duty — Court Rule — Construction — Similar Federal Rule. Federal decisions interpreting Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 may provide guidance […]

231 P.2d 274 In the Matter of the Estate of MINNIE CAINE, Deceased. LOVELL FLOYD, as Administratrix c.t.a., Appellant, v. JAMES L. CAINE, Respondent.[1] No. 31557.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 3, 1951. [1] Reported in 231 P.2d 274. [1] WILLS — CONTESTS — ALLOWANCE OF COSTS AND FEES OUT OF ESTATE. Where […]

209 P.3d 863 CAMBRIDGE TOWNHOMES, LLC, ET AL., Respondents, v. PACIFIC STAR ROOFING, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, 4 BEES SIDING, INC., ET AL., Defendants, GERALD UTLEY, Petitioner/Intervenor. No. 81003-6.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued February 10, 2009. Decided June 18, 2009. Page 476 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF […]

241 P.3d 413 Phair, Petitioner, v. Heuschel et al., Respondents. No. 84517-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 5, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 62919-1-I, January 25, 2010, 154 Wn. App. 1019. Denied.

174 P.2d 545 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM JENNINGS COOPER, Appellant.[1] No. 29908.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. November 18, 1946. [1] Reported in 174 P.2d 545. [1] HOMICIDE — INDICTMENT AND INFORMATION — ISSUES, PROOF, AND VARIANCE — PRINCIPALS AND ACCESSORIES. Under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2260, an accessory to a […]

139 P.3d 1091 CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN QWEST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KENT, Defendant. No. 78293-8The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Oral Argument Date: May 23, 2006 Filed: August 10, 2006 Appeal from Superior Court of County. Judgment or order under […]

586 P.2d 482 JERRY O. HOUSER, Petitioner, v. THE CITY OF REDMOND, Respondent. No. 44846.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 16, 1978. [1] Torts — Interference With Business Relationship — Third Person — Necessity. An action for tortious interference with a contractual relationship lies only against a third party, and not against a […]

639 P.2d 1370 LEILONI IRENE CURTIS, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent. No. 46950-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 11, 1982. [1] Statutes — Validity — Wisdom — In General. The fact that a statute may be bad or unwise does not render it invalid. [2] Obscenity — Sexual Conduct […]

92 P.2d 258 INLAND EMPIRE RURAL ELECTRIFICATION, INC., Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE et al., Appellants. No. 27568. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 10, 1939. [1] ACTION — JUDGMENT — DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACT — NATURE OF REMEDY — JUSTICIABLE CONTROVERSY. The declaratory judgment act, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 784-1 et […]

326 P.2d 53 LYLE CRITZER, Appellant, v. EDWARD W. OBAN et al., Respondents.[1] No. 34431.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 29, 1958. [1] Reported in 326 P.2d 53. [1] CORPORATIONS — NATURE AND THEORY — DISREGARD OF CORPORATE ENTITY — FACTORS CONSIDERED. In order to justify the judicial disregard of corporate entities, either […]

661 P.2d 976 INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COLLECTORS, INC., Appellant, v. GEORGE B. CARVER, ET AL, Defendants, CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. VAN DAAL, INC., Appellant, v. R.W. ALLEN, Defendant, CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. Nos. 48675-1, 48686-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. April 14, 1983. [1] Statutes — Construction — Acts Relating to […]

100 P.2d 377 LATHAN DOCKSTEADER, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF CENTRALIA, Appellant.[1] No. 27777.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. March 29, 1940. [1] Reported in 100 P.2d 377. [1] EMINENT DOMAIN — MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — TAKING OR INJURING PROPERTY — DEPRIVATION OF ACCESS — CLAIMS AGAINST CITY — NATURE OF CLAIMS TO BE PRESENTED. […]

667 P.2d 619 COAST TO COAST STORES, INC., Appellant, v. HARRISON J. GRUSCHUS, ET AL, Respondents. No. 49167-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. July 28, 1983. [1] Franchises — Termination — What Constitutes — Closure of Franchisee’s Business. The cessation of a franchisee’s business operations does not constitute termination of the franchise. The franchise […]

247 P.2d 230 CHARLES EDER, Respondent, v. ROBERT R. NELSON et al., Appellants.[1] No. 31959.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 14, 1952. [1] Reported in 247 P.2d 230. [1] BILLS AND NOTES — PRINCIPAL AND SURETY — REMEDIES OF ACCOMMODATION MAKER OR SURETY — AGAINST PRINCIPAL AFTER PAYMENT OF DEBT. An accommodation party […]

161 P.2d 533 MADGE K. BROWN, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES et al., Respondents.[1] No. 29512.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. August 23, 1945. [1] Reported in 161 P.2d 533. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — APPEAL — REVIEW — EXCLUSION OF DEPARTMENTAL RECORD — BURDEN OF PROOF. On appeal by a claimant […]

281 P.2d 859 RUSSELL K. HARPER, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Appellant.[1] No. 32986.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. April 1, 1955. [1] Reported in 281 P.2d 859. [1] WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION — COMPENSABLE INJURIES — AGGRAVATION OF PRE-EXISTING DISEASE. An injury may light up a dormant or quiescent arthritic condition; and, […]

940 P.2d 633 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ANZALA HA’MIM, Petitioner. No. 64315-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued March 25, 1997. Decided July 24, 1997. Page 835 MADSEN, JOHNSON, and SANDERS, JJ., dissent by separate opinion. Appeal from the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-02971-8, Carmen Otero, J., on November 3, 1994. […]

128 P.3d 1239 State, Respondent, v. Crow, Petitioner. No. 77067-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 10, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 31785-1-II, April 22, 2005. Denied.

223 P.2d 598 BEN BERLINER, Respondent, v. JACOB L. GREENBERG, Appellant.[1] No. 31193.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 2, 1950. [1] Reported in 223 P.2d 598. [1] PARTNERSHIP — DISSOLUTION — BY AGREEMENT — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. On an issue as to whether partners entered into an agreement to dissolve the partnership on […]

347 P.2d 536 NELL C. ANDERSON, as Executrix, Appellant, v. FRANK V. TAYLOR, JR., et al., Respondents.[1] No. 35084.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. December 10, 1959. [1] Reported in 347 P.2d 536. [1] MECHANICS’ LIENS — PROCEEDINGS TO PERFECT — TIME FOR FILING. A lien for labor performed by a lien claimant under […]

33 P.2d 93 YAKIMA COUNTY et al., Appellants, v. C.D. STEPHENS, as Treasurer for Yakima County, et al., Respondents. No. 24974. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 24, 1934. [1] WATERS AND WATERCOURSES (92) — PUBLIC SUPPLY — IRRIGATION DISTRICTS — ASSESSMENTS — EFFECT OF DEED ON LIENS. Under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7448, […]

171 P.3d 1057 Sunrise Vill. Condo. Tract “E,” Respondent, v. Lambert, Petitioner. No. 79734-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 2, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 56861-2-I, October 23, 2006, 135 Wn. App. 1024. Denied.

177 P.2d 886 THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. ROBERT HOUSTON, Appellant.[1] No. 29698.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 20, 1947. [1] Reported in 177 P.2d 886. [1] PROSTITUTION — OPERATION OF HOUSE OF PROSTITUTION — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In a prosecution for operating a house of prostitution, held that the evidence, if […]

115 P.2d 702 MARY FOWLER ROGERS et al., Respondents, v. EVERELL L. CATION et al., Appellants.[1] No. 27908.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. July 12, 1941. [1] Reported in 115 P.2d 702. [1] ADVERSE POSSESSION — ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS BY PRESCRIPTION — EVIDENCE — PRESUMPTIONS AND BURDEN OF PROOF. To establish an easement by […]

395 P.2d 46 In the Matter of the Petition of EAST COLUMBIA BASIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT.[*] No. 37478.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 27, 1964. [*] Reported in 395 P.2d 46. [1] Appeal and Error — Review — Unchallenged Findings. Since findings of fact not challenged on appeal must be taken as stating the […]