676 P.2d 1002 VELMA JANE WALTON, as Personal Representative, Petitioner, v. ABSHER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Respondent. No. 49771-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. February 16, 1984. [1] Statutes — Repeal — By Implication — Determination. A general statute does not repeal by implication a previous special statute if the statutes can be harmonized and […]
Category: Washington Supreme Court Opinions
PETERS v. BELLINGHAM COAL MINES, 173 Wn. 123 (1933)
21 P.2d 1024 CHARLES A. PETERS et al., Respondents, v. BELLINGHAM COAL MINES, Appellant. No. 24321. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 12, 1933. [1] MINES AND MINERALS (19-3) — OPERATION OF MINES — RIGHTS OF SURFACE OWNERS — LIABILITY FOR SUBSIDENCE. The honeycombed condition of the earth left by coal mining, whereby 45 […]
ARROW TRANSP. CO. v. A.O. SMITH CO., 75 Wn.2d 843 (1969)
454 P.2d 387 ARROW TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Respondent, v. A.O. SMITH COMPANY, Appellant.[*] No. 39283.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. May 1, 1969. [*] Reported in 454 P.2d 387. [1] Sales — Warranties — Express Warranty — Reliance on Advertisement. Before an advertisement published by a manufacturer can be used as a basis for recovery […]
NAT. ETC. CO. v. SEATTLE ASS’N ETC., 18 Wn.2d 1 (1943)
137 P.2d 503 NATIONAL CASH REGISTER COMPANY, Respondent, v. SEATTLE ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN, Appellant.[1] No. 28723.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. May 13, 1943. [1] Reported in 137 P.2d 503. [1] SALES — CONDITIONAL SALES — DISTINGUISHED FROM CHATTEL MORTGAGES. An agreement for the sale of two cash registers is a conditional sales […]
IN RE RAYMOND VANDELFT, 158 Wn.2d 731 (2006)
147 P.3d 573 In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of WILLIAM RAYMOND VANDELFT, Petitioner. No. 77733-1.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued May 9, 2006. Decided November 30, 2006. Page 732 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 733 Sheryl G. McCloud, […]
McPHERSON BROS. CO. v. BUELL, 167 Wn. 391 (1932)
9 P.2d 348 McPHERSON BROS. COMPANY, Appellant, v. W.E. BUELL et al., Respondents. No. 23514. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 25, 1932. [1] EASEMENTS (5, 7) — PRESCRIPTION — DURATION AND CONTINUITY OF USE — ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS OF WAY. An easement across uplands on the bank of a navigable river for a […]
BURCHFIELD v. BURCHFIELD, 5 Wn.2d 359 (1940)
105 P.2d 286 CHARLES R. BURCHFIELD, Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE B. BURCHFIELD, Respondent.[1] No. 27988.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. September 7, 1940. [1] Reported in 105 P.2d 286. [1] See 109 A.L.R. 1007; 17 Am. Jur. 365. [1] DIVORCE — RIGHT TO FINAL DECREE — RESUMPTION OF MARITAL RELATION — WHAT CONSTITUTES. A husband’s […]
STATE v. PARKISON, 163 Wn.2d 1050 (2008)
State, Respondent, v. Parkison, Petitioner. No. 80890-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 8, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 34493-9-II, October 9, 2007, 141 Wn. App. 1004. Denied.
STATE v. SIMS, 157 Wn.2d 1018 (2006)
142 P.3d 608 STATE, Respondent, v. SIMS, Petitioner. No. 78064-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 6, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 32506-0-II, November 15, 2005, 130 Wn. App. 1026. Denied.
STATE v. SWOFFORD, 163 Wn.2d 1029 (2008)
State, Respondent, v. Swofford, Petitioner. No. 80687-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 30, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 33420-8-II, August 14, 2007, 140 Wn. App. 1009. Denied.
HODGEN v. DEPT. OF LABOR INDUSTRIES, 194 Wn. 541 (1938)
78 P.2d 949 INEZ HODGEN, Respondent, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Appellant. No. 26499. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 28, 1938. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — RECORD — STATEMENT OF FACTS — NECESSITY — DISMISSAL OF APPEAL. An appeal from a judgment in a workman’s compensation case will not be dismissed […]
MM RD. RECYCLE, INC. v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEP’T., 150 Wn.2d 1012 (2003)
MM Rd. Recycle, Inc., Petitioner, v. Employment Sec. Dep’t, Respondent. No. 73844-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 4, 2003. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 28285-2-II, January 10, 2003, 115 Wn. App. 1003. Denied.
NEAT v. U.S. FIDELITY GUARANTY CO., 170 Wn. 625 (1932)
17 P.2d 32 INGRY A. NEAT, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. THE UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 24224. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 22, 1932. [1] INSURANCE (122, 157) — INDEMNITY INSURANCE — LIABILITY INCURRED FOR PERSONAL INJURIES — CONDITIONS PRECEDENT — “INSOLVENCY.” The sheriff’s return of an execution of no goods […]
UNITED STATES ETC. CO. v. WEST. SEAFOOD CO., 190 Wn. 200 (1937)
67 P.2d 892 UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. WESTERN SEAFOOD COMPANY, Respondent. No. 26381. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 28, 1937. [1] SUBROGATION — SURETIES OR GUARANTORS — PERSONS MAKING VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS. Under the rule that, where a third person has agreed with a debtor to assume and pay the debt, […]
STATE v. BYERS, 88 Wn.2d 1 (1977)
559 P.2d 1334 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHN RAY BYERS, ET AL, Petitioners. No. 43491.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 6, 1977. [1] Arrest — What Constitutes — Restriction of Liberty. An arrest occurs when a person is restrained and his liberty of movement restricted by police action or the person […]
SIMONSEN v. BASARAB, 166 Wn.2d 1005 (2009)
208 P.3d 1123 Simonsen, Respondent, v. Basarab, Petitioner. No. 82669-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 2, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 60892-4-I, November 17, 2008, 147 Wn. App. 1027. Denied.
IN RE MADIGAN, 163 Wn. 151 (1931)
300 P. 1119 In the Matter of the Proceedings for the Disbarment of HENRY MADIGAN. No. C.D. 1437. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 16, 1931. [1] ATTORNEY AND CLIENT (7) — GROUNDS FOR DISBARMENT — FRAUD — FORGERY. An attorney should be disbarred for making and forging a false order of distribution of […]
STATE v. JOHNSON, 55 Wn.2d 594 (1960)
349 P.2d 227 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MARTIN NELS JOHNSON, Appellant.[1] No. 35141.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. February 4, 1960. [1] Reported in 349 P.2d 227. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR — PRESERVATION OF GROUNDS — EXCEPTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS. Only exceptions which are made to instructions in the trial court can be […]
STATE v. BAILEY, 162 Wn.2d 1002 (2007)
175 P.3d 1092 State, Respondent, v. Bailey, Petitioner. No. 79769-2.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 4, 2007. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 33670-7-II, January 3, 2007, 136 Wn. App. 1033. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary Review. Denied.
STATE v. SIMPSON, 89 Wn.2d 803 (1978)
575 P.2d 722 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. JAMES WILLIAM SIMPSON, ET AL, Respondents. No. 45106.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 9, 1978. Nature of Action: Prosecution for grand larceny by fraud. Superior Court: The Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 24534, Del Cary Smith, Jr., J., on September 21, 1976, dismissed […]
STATE v. WEBER, 164 Wn.2d 1007 (2008)
State, Respondent, v. Weber, Petitioner. No. 81217-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 5, 2008. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 58009-4-I, December 20, 2007. Review Orders. Denied.
BRICE v. MINSHULL, 137 Wn. 70 (1925)
241 P. 667 HENRY BRICE et al., Appellants, v. J.C. MINSHULL, as Supervisor of Banking, Respondent. No. 19417. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 16, 1925. [1] MORTGAGES (256) — REDEMPTION — WAIVER — AGREEMENT FOR WAIVER — EXTENSION OF TIME. A sheriff’s deed to mortgaged property will not be cancelled because it was […]
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 97 Wn.2d 1004 (1982)
The Supreme Court of Washington. State, Respondent, v. Grundy, Petitioner, No. 48400-7. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, November 23, 1981, 30 Wn. App. 1033. Denied February 19, 1982. State, Respondent, v. Sharp, Petitioner, No. 48370-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, October 26, 1981, […]
ABERDEEN v. NATIONAL SURETY CO., 151 Wn. 55 (1929)
275 P. 62 THE CITY OF ABERDEEN et al., Respondents, v. NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY, Appellant. THE CITY OF ABERDEEN et al., Respondents, v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 21503. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. February 21, 1929. [1] MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS (493) — FISCAL MANAGEMENT — LOANING MONEY. An interest-bearing time certificate of deposit not […]
STATE EX REL. LIDRAL v. SUPERIOR COURT, 198 Wn. 610 (1939)
89 P.2d 501 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of J.F. Lidral, Plaintiff, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, James B. Kinne, Judge, Respondent. No. 27508. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 20, 1939. [1] CORPORATIONS — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS — RIGHT TO VOTE — ADJUDICATION OF OWNERSHIP OF STOCK — STOCKHOLDER […]
STATE v. SMITH, 129 Wn.2d 1015 (1996)
917 P.2d 575 State, Respondent, v. Smith, Petitioner. No. 63790-3.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 4, 1996. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, January 16, 1996, 80 Wn. App. 1022. Denied June 4, 1996.
STATE EX REL. ROBBINS v. SCOFIELD, 184 Wn. 270 (1935)
50 P.2d 1022 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Oliver M. Robbins, Respondent, v. HARVEY O. SCOFIELD et al., Appellants. No. 25883. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 4, 1935. [1] PAUPERS (1) — COUNTIES (55) — LIABILITY IMPOSED BY STATUTE — LIABILITY OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES. The exhaustion of the county budget […]
STATE EX REL. PAC. BRIDGE CO. v. WASH. T.B.A., 8 Wn.2d 337 (1941)
112 P.2d 135 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Pacific Bridge Company et al., Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON TOLL BRIDGE AUTHORITY et al., Respondents.[1] No. 28314.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 12, 1941. [1] Reported in 112 P.2d 135. [1] MANDAMUS — JURISDICTION — STATE OFFICERS — TOLL BRIDGE AUTHORITY. The Washington […]
IN RE FELICE, 112 Wn.2d 520 (1989)
772 P.2d 505 In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against VICTOR J. FELICE, an Attorney at Law. No. 1924.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 11, 1989. [1] Attorney and Client — Discipline — Findings of Fact — Review. In an attorney disciplinary proceeding, the Supreme Court will not disturb findings of fact […]
HEMMEN v. CLARK’S RESTAURANT, 72 Wn.2d 690 (1967)
434 P.2d 729 VICTOR HEMMEN et al., Respondents, v. CLARK’S RESTAURANT ENTERPRISES, Appellant.[*] No. 38984.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. December 8, 1967. [*] Reported in 434 P.2d 729. [1] Trial — Taking Case From Jury — Sufficiency of Evidence. Motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence admit the truth of the opponent’s evidence […]
STATE v. MOONEY, 170 Wn. 260 (1932)
16 P.2d 455 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. R.M. MOONEY, Appellant. No. 23836. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 28, 1932. [1] HOMICIDE (100) — INSTRUCTIONS — ELEMENTS OF OFFENSE — RECKLESS DRIVING. In a prosecution for manslaughter through driving in a reckless manner, it is proper to give instructions in the language […]
JOHNSON v. RUTHERFORD, 32 Wn.2d 194 (1948)
200 P.2d 977 H.W. JOHNSON, Respondent, v. JAMES H. RUTHERFORD et al., Appellants.[1] No. 30733.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. December 23, 1948. [1] Reported in 200 P.2d 977. [1] BROKERS — COMPENSATION — NECESSITY OF LICENSE — SALE OF BUSINESS. In an action by a “business broker” for compensation for his services in […]
STATE v. THOMPSON, 171 Wn.2d 1018 (2011)
253 P.3d 392 State, Respondent, v. Thompson, Petitioner. No. 85674-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 26, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals No. 64321-5-I, November 15, 2010, 158 Wn. App. 1038. Denied.
GLICK v. ROPES, 18 Wn.2d 260 (1943)
138 P.2d 858 CHARLES E. GLICK, Appellant, v. RAY ROPES et al., Respondents.[1] No. 28948.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. June 23, 1943. [1] Reported in 138 P.2d 858. [1] AUTOMOBILES — LIABILITY FOR INJURIES — ACTIONS — INSTRUCTIONS — LEFT TURN. In an automobile collision case, where a car making a left turn […]
METCALF v. MUD BAY LOGGING CO., 170 Wn. 59 (1932)
15 P.2d 278 CONDE METCALF, Appellant, v. MUD BAY LOGGING COMPANY, Respondent. No. 23866. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 25, 1932. [1] RAILROADS (64) — ACCIDENTS AT CROSSINGS — CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE — CARE IN GOING ON TRACKS. The driver of an automobile, struck at a railroad crossing by a large railroad speeder, is […]
IN RE DEP. OF K.S.C. v. DEP’T OF SOC. AND HLT. SERV., 136 Wn.2d 1028 (1998)
972 P.2d 464 In re Dependency of K.S.C. Burrell, Petitioner, v. The Department of Social and Health Services, Respondent, No. 66999-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. Granted December 1, 1998. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 40165-3-I. March 10, 1998.
STATE v. SMITH, 56 Wn.2d 368 (1960)
353 P.2d 155 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ALLEN CALVIN SMITH, Appellant.[1] No. 35077.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. June 23, 1960. [1] Reported in 353 P.2d 155. [1] CONTINUANCE — ABSENCE OF WITNESS — DILIGENCE — PROCURING OF WITNESS — SHOWING — NECESSITY. It is not error for a trial court to […]
BALDWIN v. WASHINGTON MOTOR COACH CO., 196 Wn. 117 (1938)
82 P.2d 131 RUTH G. BALDWIN, as Administratrix, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MOTOR COACH COMPANY, Respondent. No. 27001. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 16, 1938. [1] AUTOMOBILES — LIABILITY FOR INJURIES — VIOLATION OF STATUTE — TECHNICAL VIOLATION — INSTRUCTIONS. In an action for damages from an automobile collision, the negligence charged being violation […]
RIVAS v. OVERLAKE HOSP. MED. CTR. ET AL., 161 Wn.2d 1007 (2007)
166 P.3d 1217 Rivas, Petitioner, v. Overlake Hosp. Med. Ctr. et al., Defendants, Eastside Radiology Assocs. et al., Respondents. No. 79506-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 6, 2007. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 55648-7-I, September 18, […]
STATE v. FRANKS, 74 Wn.2d 413 (1968)
445 P.2d 200 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANNY T. FRANKS, Appellant.[*] No. 39404.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. September 12, 1968. [*] Reported in 445 P.2d 200. [1] Appeal and Error — Review — Issues Not Raised in Trial Court. Objection to improper statements in the prosecution’s closing argument must be timely […]
NORTHERN P.R. CO. v. YAKIMA-NORTHERN STAGES, 135 Wn. 595 (1925)
238 P. 905 NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent, v. YAKIMA-NORTHERN STAGES, INCORPORATED, Appellant. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Relator and Cross-Appellant, v. YAKIMA-NORTHERN STAGES, INCORPORATED, Appellant and Cross-Respondent. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Relator and Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS et al., Respondents. Nos. 19182, 19183, 19333. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 21, […]
CROSSEN v. SKAGIT COUNTY, 100 Wn.2d 355 (1983)
669 P.2d 1244 RAMONA CROSSEN, as Guardian, Petitioner, v. SKAGIT COUNTY, Respondent. No. 49375-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. September 29, 1983. [1] Trial — Instructions — Exceptions — Sufficiency — Bare Citation. An exception to an instruction is sufficient under CR 51(f) if it apprises the trial judge of the nature and substance […]
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW[†] , 122 Wn.2d 1015 (1993)
The Supreme Court of Washington. [†] Dispositions of Court of Appeals Commissioner rulings are identified by case names not in italic. State, Respondent, v. Putman, Petitioner, No. 59448-1. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, May 14, 1992, 65 Wn. App. 606. Denied October 6, 1993. Alexander Alexander of Wash., Inc., […]
HAYNES v. COLUMBIA PRODUCERS, INC., 54 Wn.2d 899 (1959)
344 P.2d 1032 E.R. HAYNES, Respondent and Cross-appellant, v. COLUMBIA PRODUCERS, INC., Appellant.[1] No. 34874.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. October 15, 1959. [1] Reported in 344 P.2d 1032. [1] CONTRACTS — CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION — COMPENSATION. Under an oral cost-plus contract for the installation of machinery in a warehouse, the contractor was not […]
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE CO. v. CUSHMAN, 22 Wn.2d 930 (1945)
158 P.2d 101 SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Appellant, v. ERNEST F. CUSHMAN et al., Respondents.[1] No. 29515.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 26, 1945. [1] Reported in 158 P.2d 101. [1] NEW TRIAL — NATURE AND SCOPE OF REMEDY — DISCRETION OF COURT. The granting or denial of a new trial […]
DOUGLASS v. GRAYS HARBOR FUEL CO., 182 Wn. 227 (1935)
46 P.2d 733 A.W. DOUGLASS, Respondent, v. GRAYS HARBOR FUEL COMPANY, Appellant. No. 25555. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 17, 1935. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR (278) — RECORD — STATEMENT OF FACTS — TIME FOR FILING. The filing of a statement of facts within 90 days after entry of judgment is mandatory and […]
SALISBURY v. MEEKER, 152 Wn. 146 (1929)
277 P. 376 G.E. SALISBURY et al., Respondents, v. MAUDE MEEKER, Appellant. MAUDE MEEKER, Appellant, v. G.E. SALISBURY et al., Respondents. No. 21518. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 9, 1929. [1] HUSBAND AND WIFE (57) — COMMUNITY PROPERTY — EARNINGS OF HUSBAND OR WIFE. Gains and profits acquired after marriage in the prosecution […]
ZAMORA v. MOBIL OIL, 104 Wn.2d 211 (1985)
704 P.2d 591 VALENTINE ZAMORA, ET AL, Plaintiffs, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, ET AL, Respondents, CAL GAS CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 51193-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 1, 1985. [1] Compromise and Settlement — Torts — Indemnity — Settlement Agreement — Effect. The participation of a joint tortfeasor in a settlement agreement with claimants […]
JOHNSON v. WILSON, 145 Wn. 515 (1927)
261 P. 102 THEODORE JOHNSON, Appellant, v. GLEN E. WILSON, as Administrator of the Estate of F.K. Robinson, Deceased, et al., Respondents. No. 20724. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 15, 1927. [1] MARSHALING ASSETS (1, 2) — RIGHTS OF PARAMOUNT CREDITOR — EVIDENCE OF RIGHT — SUFFICIENCY. The burden of proof rests upon […]
STATE v. STEVENSON, 161 Wn. 357 (1931)
296 P. 1052 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHN STEVENSON, Appellant. No. 22896. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 20, 1931. [1] LARCENY (9) — INDICTMENT AND INFORMATION — OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY — SPECIAL INTEREST. An information alleging larceny of horses, substantially in the language of the statute, alleging that they were the […]
STATE v. JOHNSON, 71 Wn.2d 239 (1967)
427 P.2d 705 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOE J. JOHNSON et al., Appellants.[*] No. 38944.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. May 11, 1967. [*] Reported in 427 P.2d 705. [1] Searches and Seizures — As Incident of Arrest — Arrest as Pretext for Search. In order for a search without a warrant […]
STATE v. POSEY, 168 Wn.2d 1031 (2010)
State, Respondent, v. Posey, Petitioner. No. 82957-8.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 28, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 26771-7-III, March 3, 2009. Granted.
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 141 Wn.2d 1005 (2000)
The Supreme Court of Washington. 2000. Carpenter, Petitioner, v. Elway, et al., Respondents. Morrow, Respondent, v. Ruiz-Beyo, et al., Defendants. Ing, et al., Respondents, v. Haskins, et al., Petitioners, No. 69205-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, November 19, 1999, 97 Wn. App. 977. Denied as to petitioner Carpenter, deferred […]
PHILIPP v. STATE, 66 Wn.2d 921 (1965)
400 P.2d 769 WALTER H. PHILIPP, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., Respondents.[*] No. 37339.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 8, 1965. [*] Reported in 400 P.2d 769. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 35016, Raymond W. Clifford, J., entered August 26, 1963. Affirmed. Action […]
GREGORY v. SECURITY BANK TRUST CO., 148 Wn. 106 (1928)
267 P. 1058 F.W. GREGORY, as Receiver, Appellant, v. SECURITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent. No. 21063. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 13, 1928. [1] BANKS AND BANKING (31) — RELATION BETWEEN BANK AND DEPOSITOR FOR COLLECTION. A bank taking checks conditionally, and charging the same back to the drawee on dishonor, does […]
TITUS v. TACOMA SMELTERMEN’S UNION, 62 Wn.2d 461 (1963)
383 P.2d 504 E.P. TITUS et al., Respondents, v. TACOMA SMELTERMEN’S UNION LOCAL NO. 25, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF MINE, MILL AND SMELTER WORKERS et al., Appellants.[*] No. 36137.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. July 3, 1963. [*] Reported in 383 P.2d 504. [1]Contracts — Interference by Third Party — Liability. While a person may […]
STATE v. PAYNTER, 162 Wn.2d 1010 (2008)
175 P.3d 1093 State, Respondent, v. Paynter, Petitioner. No. 79910-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 8, 2008. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 34004-6-II, December 19, 2006. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary Review. Denied.
STATE v. AIOLUPOTEA, 129 Wn.2d 1031 (1996)
922 P.2d 97 State, Respondent, v. Aiolupotea, Petitioner. No. 64010-6.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 4, 1996. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, March 8, 1996, 80 Wn. App. 1070. Denied September 4, 1996. Page 1032
FISHBACK v. BOTHELL BUS CO., 150 Wn. 49 (1928)
272 P. 67 H.O. FISHBACK, Respondent, v. BOTHELL BUS COMPANY, Appellant. No. 21555. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 30, 1928. [1] INSURANCE (8) — MUTUAL COMPANIES — GUARANTY OBLIGATIONS — ASSESSMENTS — WRONGFUL LEVY — BASIS. Where the contract and by-laws of an automobile insurance exchange, organized as an inter-insurance association, required that, […]
STODDARD v. KING COUNTY, 22 Wn.2d 868 (1945)
158 P.2d 78 GEORGE WELLINGTON STODDARD, Appellant, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent.[1] No. 29519.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. April 19, 1945. [1] Reported in 158 P.2d 78. [1] COUNTIES — CONTRACTS — POWERS OF COUNTY BOARD — EMPLOYMENT — BURDEN OF PROOF. In an action by an architect against a county for services, the […]
STATE v. REANIER, 170 Wn.2d 1018 (2011)
245 P.3d 773 State, Petitioner, v. Reanier, Respondent. The Supreme Court of Washington. No. 85038-1. January 4, 2011. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 63717-7-I, August 2, 2010, 157 Wn. App. 194. Denied
FIDELITY DEPOSIT CO. v. AUBURN, 150 Wn. 114 (1928)
272 P. 34 FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF AUBURN et al., Respondents. No. 21309. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. November 30, 1928. [1] SUBROGATION (1) — MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS (163) — SURETIES OR GUARANTORS — PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS — CONTRACTS — ASSIGNMENT. A surety of the contractor on public work guaranteeing […]
LALLY v. ANDERSON, 194 Wn. 536 (1938)
78 P.2d 603 THOMAS A.E. LALLY, as Receiver, Appellant, v. J.A. ANDERSON et al., Respondents. No. 26935. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. April 27, 1938. [1] BANKS AND BANKING — INSOLVENCY AND RECEIVERS — STOCKHOLDERS — SUPERADDED OR STATUTORY LIABILITY ON INSOLVENCY — NATIONAL BANKS. The liability of the stockholders of a national bank […]
SMITH v. ELDRIDGE MOTORS, INC., 199 Wn. 10 (1939)
90 P.2d 257, 93 P.2d 1120 THOMAS E. SMITH, Respondent, v. ELDRIDGE MOTORS, INC., Appellant. A.E. WHEELER, Respondent, v. ELDRIDGE MOTORS, INC., Appellant. No. 27348. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. May 4, 1939. [1] AUTOMOBILES — MASTER AND SERVANT — INJURIES TO THIRD PERSONS — SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT — OWNERSHIP OF VEHICLE — PRIMA […]
ELLIOTT v. FISCHER, 36 Wn.2d 774 (1950)
220 P.2d 338 PAUL ELLIOTT, Respondent, v. KARL L. FISCHER, Appellant.[1] No. 31391.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 10, 1950. [1] Reported in 220 P.2d 338. [1] VENDOR AND PURCHASER — FRAUD — RESCISSION BY PURCHASER — ACTIONS — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. In an action to rescind a contract to purchase a dairy farm, cows, […]
CUDNEY v. ALSCO, INC., 172 Wn.2d 524 (2011)
259 P.3d 244 Certification From the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington in MATTHEW CUDNEY, Plaintiff, v. ALSCO, INC., Defendant. No. 83124-6.The Supreme Court of Washington.Argued January 12, 2010. Decided September 1, 2011. Page 525 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, No. CV-08-314-LRS, Lonny […]
IN RE POMPAL’S ESTATE, 150 Wn. 242 (1928)
272 P. 980 In the Matter of the Estate of JOSEPH M. POMPAL, Deceased. LOUISE POMPAL et al., Respondents, v. F.L. JEWETT, Appellant. No. 21246. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 13, 1928. [1] APPEAL (88) — EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS (91) — AGGRIEVED PARTIES — CLAIMS — REVIEW. A creditor has a right to […]
GABALIS v. CAMPBELL, 185 Wn. 387 (1936)
55 P.2d 615 JOE GABALIS, Appellant, v. CHARLIE CAMPBELL et al., Respondents. No. 25962. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. March 9, 1936. [1] APPEAL AND ERROR (418) — REVIEW — FINDINGS. Where the testimony is in hopeless conflict and the trial court saw and heard the witnesses, its finding is entitled to great weight, […]
STATE EX REL. SEATTLE v. NORTHERN PAC. R. CO., 166 Wn. 437 (1932)
7 P.2d 29 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of The City of Seattle, Respondent, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Respondents, PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. No. 23288. En Banc.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 26, 1932. [1] MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS (27) — RAILROADS (31) — GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS — JUDICIAL SUPERVISION — CONSTRUCTION […]
MISSION SPRINGS v. CITY OF SPOKANE, 134 Wn.2d 947 (1998)
954 P.2d 250 MISSION SPRINGS, INC., ET AL., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF SPOKANE, ET AL., Respondents. No. 63836-5.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.Argued January 21, 1997. Decided April 23, 1998. Page 948 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page […]
STATE v. MOORE, 15 Wn.2d 460 (1942)
131 P.2d 148 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. WALLACE H. MOORE, Appellant.[1] No. 28768.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. November 25, 1942. [1] Reported in 131 P.2d 148. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — APPEAL FROM JUSTICE COURT — DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF DILIGENCE. A motion to dismiss an appeal from a conviction in justice […]
IN RE HARRIS, 94 Wn.2d 430 (1980)
617 P.2d 739 In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of THEODORE HARRIS, ET AL, Petitioners. Nos. 46710, 46712, 46713.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. October 2, 1980. [1] Mental Health — Criminal Law — Insanity — Commitment — Civil or Criminal Procedure. A prosecutor has no discretion to seek to have a person […]
PUD NO. 2 OF GRANT CY. v. STATE, 82 Wn.2d 232 (1973)
510 P.2d 206 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY et al., Respondents, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant. Nos. 41996, 41997.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 17, 1973. [1] Taxation — Commerce — Tax on Interstate Commerce — Validity — Determination. The characterization of a tax is not determinative of its […]
STATE v. TALBOTT, 199 Wn. 431 (1939)
91 P.2d 1020 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. EARL TALBOTT, Appellant. No. 27484. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 30, 1939. [1] CRIMINAL LAW — TRIAL — VERDICT — CERTAINTY — APPLICATION TO SEVERAL COUNTS. In a prosecution for murder charged in two counts, one for murder while engaged in committing, attempting to […]
STATE v. BAUER, 92 Wn.2d 162 (1979)
595 P.2d 544 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. LAURENCE GERALD BAUER, Appellant. No. 45261.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. May 24, 1979. [1] Statutes — Construction — Language Used — In General. Meaning should be given to each word in a statute, if possible. [2] Parent and Child — Nonsupport — Elements of […]
STATE v. HONGEL, 154 Wn.2d 1019 (2005)
State, Respondent, v. Hongel, Petitioner. No. 74722-9.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 2, 2005. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 26653-9-II, October 14, 2003, 118 Wn. App. 1069. Denied. Page 1020
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON, 149 Wn. 700 (1928)
272 P. 89 HAZEL M. JOHNSON, Respondent, v. PAUL J. JOHNSON, Appellant. No. 21443. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 18, 1928. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wright, J., entered March 12, 1927, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff in an action for a divorce. Affirmed. A.G. […]
LEONARD v. SEATTLE, 81 Wn.2d 479 (1972)
503 P.2d 741 SAMUEL GAIL LEONARD, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE et al., Appellants. No. 42199.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. November 15, 1972. [1] Declaratory Judgment — Serving Attorney General — Necessity — Waiver. The requirement of RCW 7.24.110 that the Attorney General be served with a copy of pleadings seeking to […]
STATE EX REL. ZEMPEL v. TWITCHELL, 59 Wn.2d 419 (1962)
367 P.2d 985 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Arnold R. Zempel, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT TWITCHELL, Defendant and Relator, THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR SNOHOMISH COUNTY, William J. Wilkins, Judge, Respondent.[*] No. 35956.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. January 12, 1962. [*] Reported in 367 P.2d 985. [1] CIVIL PROCEDURE — PLEADINGS AND […]
ANTHONY v. DEPT. OF LABOR INDUSTRIES, 178 Wn. 506 (1934)
35 P.2d 54 ALEXANDER ANTHONY, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent. No. 25050. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 13, 1934. [1] MASTER AND SERVANT (121-2) — REMEDIES UNDER WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT — CAUSE OF DEATH — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY. The decision of the department disallowing a workman’s claim being prima […]
FUNK v. INLAND POWER LIGHT CO., 164 Wn. 110 (1931)
1 P.2d 872 GEO. H. FUNK et al., Appellants, v. INLAND POWER LIGHT COMPANY et al., Respondents. No. 23152. Department Two.The Supreme Court of Washington. August 12, 1931. [1] EMINENT DOMAIN (59, 165) — COMPENSATION — INJURING PROPERTY — REMOTE CONSEQUENCES — REMEDIES OF OWNERS — INJUNCTION. A non-riparian owner of timber lands near a […]
STATE v. CROMWELL, 77356-4 (Wash. 8-10-2006)
140 P.3d 593 STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. GEORGE RICHARD CROMWELL and JENNIFER SHIRLEY REYNOLDS-CROMWELL, Petitioners. No. 77356-4The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Filed: August 10, 2006 Appeal from Superior Court, King County. 01-1-08547-2. Honorable Richard F McDermott. Counsel for Petitioner(s), Kathryn A. Russell Selk, Russell Selk Law Office, 1037 NE 65th St Box […]
DAVIS v. SHIP LUMBER MILL CO., 132 Wn. 167 (1925)
231 P. 937 J.A. DAVIS, Appellant, v. SHIP LUMBER MILL COMPANY, Respondent. No. 18657. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 5, 1925. APPEAL (365, 395) — PLEADING (26) — SCOPE OF REVIEW — STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION. Where parts of the original and first amended complaints demurred to were erroneously stricken and error […]
STATE v. ANDERSON, 94 Wn.2d 176 (1980)
616 P.2d 612 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BRENT R. ANDERSON, Appellant. No. 46189.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. August 21, 1980. [1] Criminal Law — Trial — Time of Trial — Delayed Arraignment — Application of Rule. Under former versions of CrR 3.3, which began the speedy trial period at the time […]
BARCOTT v. STANDRING, 163 Wn. 357 (1931)
1 P.2d 213 MARY BARCOTT, by her Guardian ad Litem, John Barcott, Respondent, v. GEORGE L. STANDRING et al., Appellants. KATIE BARCOTT et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE L. STANDRING et al., Appellants. No. 23161. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. July 9, 1931. [1] HIGHWAYS (52) — NEGLIGENT USE — ACTS IN EMERGENCIES. An automobile […]
DENNISON v. HARDEN, 29 Wn.2d 243 (1947)
186 P.2d 908 M.L. DENNISON, Appellant, v. CHARLES H. HARDEN et al., Respondents.[1] No. 30243.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One. November 20, 1947. [1] Reported in 186 P.2d 908. [1] TRIAL — RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE — EFFECT OF FAILURE TO OBJECT — PAROL EVIDENCE. The parol evidence rule is a rule of substantive law; […]
KAHLER v. SQUIRE, 49 Wn.2d 911 (1956)
299 P.2d 570 In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of ROGER JAMES KAHLER, Petitioner, v. P.J. SQUIRE, as Superintendent of the State Reformatory, Respondent.[1] No. 33615.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two. July 3, 1956. [1] Reported in 299 P.2d 570. Application filed in the supreme court December 29, […]
SCHWEICKERT v. VENWEST YACHTS, 165 Wn.2d 1012 (2009)
Schweickert, Petitioner, v. Venwest Yachts, Inc., Respondent. No. 81669-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 6, 2009. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 58321-2-I, February 4, 2008, 142 Wn. App. 886. Denied.
TEXACO REF. MKTG. v. DEP’T OF REVENUE, 158 Wn.2d 1012 (2006)
Texaco Ref. Mktg., Inc., Petitioner, v. Dep’t of Revenue, Respondent. No. 78390-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 31, 2006. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 33315-5-II, January 31, 2006, 131 Wn. App. 385. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary Review. Denied.
STATE v. MACK, 89 Wn.2d 788 (1978)
576 P.2d 44 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents, v. VIRGINIA MACK, Appellant. ROBERT A. SPOONER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents. DANIEL LEE HENDRICKSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Respondents. No. 44746.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. March 9, 1978. [1] Courts of Limited Jurisdiction — […]
KING COUNTY v. PRIMEAU, 98 Wn.2d 321 (1982)
654 P.2d 1199 KING COUNTY, Petitioner, v. IRENE PRIMEAU, Respondent. No. 48472-4.The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc. December 9, 1982. [1] Searches and Seizures — Administrative Search — Opportunity To Consent — Necessity — Statutory Language. Under an ordinance providing for the entry onto private property to inspect for compliance with land use or […]
HOTTEL v. SWANSON, 166 Wn. 220 (1932)
6 P.2d 416 A.J. HOTTEL, Respondent, v. C.E. SWANSON, Appellant. No. 23197. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. January 7, 1932. [1] LOGS AND LOGGING (3) — CONTRACTS FOR CUTTING OR HAULING. The evidence sustains findings that no rent was to be charged against a party to a logging contract, where he testified to that […]
STATE v. REESMAN, 167 Wn.2d 1021 (2010)
224 P.3d 774 State, Respondent, v. Reesman, Petitioner. No. 83569-1.The Supreme Court of Washington. Denied January 6, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 37520-6-II, August 13, 2009, 151 Wn. App. 1044. Review Order. Denied
NARUP v. BENSON, 154 Wn. 646 (1929)
283 P. 179 J.A. NARUP et al., Respondents, v. JOHN BENSON et al., Appellants. No. 22044. Department One.The Supreme Court of Washington. December 17, 1929. [1] PLEADING (107) — AMENDMENT — COMPLAINT. A complaint for fraud is properly amended to change “warranties” to “statements,” respecting the acreage of land. [2] FRAUD (6) — VENDOR AND […]
STATE v. LAGERVALL, 169 Wn.2d 1022 (2010)
State, Respondent, v. Lagervall, Petitioner. No. 84510-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. September 9, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 37647-4-II, March 16, 2010, 155 Wn. App. 1005. Denied.
STATE v. BERRY, 158 Wn.2d 1006 (2006)
State, Respondent, v. Berry, Petitioner. No. 77685-7.The Supreme Court of Washington. October 11, 2006. Petition for review of decisions of the Court of Appeals, Nos. 54521-3-I and 54522-1-I, August 15, 2005, 129 Wn. App. 59. Dispositions of Petitions for Review and Selected Motions for Discretionary Review. Denied. Page 1007
STATE v. ROPER, 168 Wn.2d 1037 (2010)
State, Respondent, v. Roper, Petitioner. No. 84075-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 1, 2010. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 63840-8-I, November 9, 2009, 152 Wn. App. 1064. Denied. Page 1038
SUMMERS v. SASAKI, 151 Wn.2d 1026 (2004)
Summers, Petitioner, v. Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Respondent. No. 74713-0.The Supreme Court of Washington. June 2, 2004. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, No. 21594-6-III, October 7, 2003, 118 Wn. App. 1063. Denied June 2, 2004. Page 1027
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 91 Wn.2d 1013 (1978)
The Supreme Court of Washington. Kraack, Petitioner, v. International Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 77, et al, Respondents, No. 45808. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, August 15, 1978, 20 Wn. App. 1052. Denied January 19, 1979. Simpson Timber Co., Petitioner, v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., et al, Respondents, No. […]
DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR REVIEW, 112 Wn.2d 1001 (1989)
The Supreme Court of Washington. Wiltse, et al, Respondents, v. Albertson’s Inc., Petitioner, No. 55727-6. Petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, November 1, 1988, 52 Wn. App. 641. Granted February 28, 1989. Robinson, Petitioner, v. Safeway Stores, Inc., Respondent, No. 55806-0. Petition for review of a decision of the Court […]