WOLFORD v. WOLFORD, 70 Wn.2d 1019 (1967)


425 P.2d 897

BEVERLY WOLFORD, Respondent, v. RICHARD WOLFORD, Appellant.[*]

No. 38857.The Supreme Court of Washington. Department One.
March 23, 1967.

[*] Reported in 425 P.2d 897.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 28291, A.H. Ward, J., entered January 3, 1966. Affirmed.

Action for divorce. Defendant appeals from the division of property and the award for child support and alimony.

Wettrick, Toulouse, Lirhus Hove and Arnold J. Barer, for appellant.

Welts Welts, by David A. Welts, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a divorce action. The husband is dissatisfied with the property division, the amount of child support allowed, and, particularly, with the award of alimony.

We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in any of the areas of dissatisfaction. The judgment is affirmed.[1]

[1] We have not overlooked the request by counsel for the wife for additional attorneys’ fees on this appeal. No showing has been made warranting such action. See Gibson v. Von Olnhausen, 43 Wn.2d 803, 263 P.2d 954 (1953).

Page 1