STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. KERMIT RICHARD SCHREIBER, Appellant.

No. 66132-9-I.The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
Filed: July 5, 2011. UNPUBLISHED OPINION.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 08-1-12070-4, Mary Yu, J., entered September 29, 2010.

Reversed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kermit Schreiber appeals a ruling denying his post-judgment motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of third degree assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that his plea was involuntary because it was based on misinformation regarding a direct consequence of the plea, i.e. his sentencing range. See In re Isadore, 151 Wn.2d 294, 302, 88 P.3d 390 (2004) (guilty plea invalid if defendant was not informed of a direct consequence of the plea). We accept the concession and reverse and remand for entry of an order granting Schreiber’s motion to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.